From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 11 15:28:43 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtuZe-0007ch-Ov for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:42 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GtuZe-0007ca-Fq for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:42 -0800 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:28:42 -0800 To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Lojabn Archive Scan - Draft Attitudinal Analysis Message-ID: <20061211232842.GJ5067@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org References: <431FA42A.8060406@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <431FA42A.8060406@lojban.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 119 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce This actually came from me. As you can probably see, I didn't black out the stuff I was supposed to. My bad; please ignore that stuff. -Robin On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 10:38:34PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > Nora remembered how to do a scan. Attached are scans of the two sides > of the sheet I mentioned in my post, the draft assignment of emotions to > a scale. It's high resolution so depending on your viewer, you may need > to view it at something like 5% zoom. You may be able to reduce the > resolution and thus the filespace, but it is only 4 meg as-is for the > two files, so I'm leaving that for you to decide. > > I'm sending to Jorge because he asked for it, and to Robin in case you > guys decide to put it on the web site. Robin, I ask that if you do so, > and you have the capability, that you attempt to blot out the financial > transaction notes in the lower right (I don't know how using my easily > available software, but I'm sure that most photo editors can do so). I > scribbled out the names, but I suspect that someone could read them if > they really wanted to. I doubt if the names would be very important, > but suggest that we err on the principle of privacy protection. > > If someone can't read some word, let me know and I'll attempt to > interpret my scrawl. -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/