From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 15 09:20:34 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list bpfk-announce); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HzEXG-0001nz-O1 for bpfk-announce-real@lojban.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:32 -0700 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.245]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HzEXD-0001nP-Ma for bpfk-announce@lojban.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:30 -0700 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b21so250370ana for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=fzNHES1Tdv0Wr9PK+fqcDU88QCnzqtkzefBX8308c7nSqF/9lqr9W9BzSgSKQl2YoCwmHKpmHTvYEFtwElBFGuP+d+Dst22NpGd6uLKOIvmQ5l3MW47czpygNd41v/037DA41hT36ZR+JvnwAQKRa/M+rgQH4cSnksQqzkAgrDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ngN4Efl/2PzgeV3/q6WUDH41+W5HUGIOc7XSs5c9upYIfFVYrQfG8TKlqrgGxcz40Kqtrts5Gt5QP6gmKcRTYw83Z4/sED92zksrVFh6UY/zAfKchzVhfrHZ2FiBh5oMTIIHkFnEFVVikayl0k0M/+ZB7wZe5fJ2Rmx0nR2EAMg= Received: by 10.100.111.16 with SMTP id j16mr1051216anc.1181924420847; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.42.17 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560706150920k21c87fc3g3041cedd8616aa94@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 13:20:20 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: bpfk-announce@lojban.org Subject: [bpfk-announce] Re: Current checkpoint In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d17560706091803h3d5f192sfd55bd7e99b39560@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560706150752o57aacdf6sec8c9d2b7dc6ef97@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 142 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: bpfk-announce-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: bpfk-announce@lojban.org X-list: bpfk-announce On 6/15/07, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: > > I'm reading this. I think August 20th is an achievable deadline for my > section. !ui > The main issue I face is that a lot of the clusters don't seem to have much > meaning. I've tried to create a standard meaning for them, but many, even if > they could mean something, seem artificial. So we've got a few options: > > 1) completely exclude the less useful/used combinations That has been my policy with the sections I'm shepherding, e.g. I didn't bother to write a definition for {coico'o}. > 2) define them, but don't create keywords for them I've done that with some cmavo. > 3) create keywords, but they'll be pretty lousy keywords I have gone with lousy keywords even for some noncompound cmavo too. I don't think we should worry too much about keywords, as long as the definition is clear and some helpful example can be found or created. > We also need good example sentences for some of them. So closer to the due > date, I'll probably be writing the list begging for help with examples. je'e ki'e mi'e xorxes