From 37wXHSwoJCQgrrttiujqi0ouiqt.kwujxns-tq01owwotmozw2x0.kwu@groups.bounces.google.com Thu Apr 15 05:26:42 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <37wXHSwoJCQgrrttiujqi0ouiqt.kwujxns-tq01owwotmozw2x0.kwu@groups.bounces.google.com>) id 1O2O9P-0004cG-P9; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:37 -0700 Received: by vws19 with SMTP id 19sf674837vws.16 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:date:received:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-authentication-results:x-original-sender:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nRXejqBn/s2nGFiaFYqk0Z921ffkWma9LC4hDXd3SGg=; b=u0rpGcYXfvG8fDAZ9txuQOCyeFopwk1Osj/fzrUZsqpqYnnuu6q7MFpec95SqN5ZuC 53bOugBibJPV330+QOtP6N101mhGBUnQdZ6JTij7c/9YLXBumuei9yLaOiDZMkLOkiFw RsYXyemU8h8/6Gk13HkEnhU6E8xmUcZVOmShU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-authentication-results :x-original-sender:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:x-thread-url:x-message-url:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=6JDZh7MKaRERloztOVRP44tHl/TCgZo8+jDe2PMypW7iT5cD9WsTAITHbrnWxR2Ny4 4w0VMJbhVhXPD/7pTKCc1ImzNMz7ZL/kalT+J87Epc+cspnpzcPLlzmU72mVu++h3EDZ i8GaC4iTZagFfIrhJBJ7bj1sWU1b5mMqDNfc8= Received: by 10.220.122.234 with SMTP id m42mr647654vcr.59.1271334383122; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:23 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.70.17 with SMTP id b17ls500514vcj.2.p; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.73.204 with SMTP id r12mr1893084vcj.29.1271334381893; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.73.204 with SMTP id r12mr1893083vcj.29.1271334381865; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com (mail-qy0-f188.google.com [209.85.221.188]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 34si3670137vws.3.2010.04.15.05.26.20; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.221.188; Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so1335462qyk.19 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.75 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100415071153.GW20647@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20100413070335.GW20647@digitalkingdom.org> <9a4b189b-cdba-4e6b-9e3b-47992d834db8@i12g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> <20100415071153.GW20647@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:26:20 -0300 Received: by 10.229.97.207 with SMTP id m15mr4636359qcn.6.1271334380385; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:26:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: If you're reading this, *you* are the BPFK (AKA: help very much wanted) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.221.188 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: X-Thread-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/t/e4f2bc290ffd5d4e X-Message-Url: http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/msg/354983b37f93c16a Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 07:34:05AM -0700, lincro wrote: >> >> How much of a concern is the formatting as a goal in itself? =A0For >> example, if I see that >> http://www.lojban.org/tiki/BPFK+Section%3A+Highlight+Discursives >> isn't green, but that it seems complete (I'm not saying that it >> actually is), except that the format isn't like the template, >> should effort be expended to get into the same format as the >> template? One reason the sections I wrote don't follow the template format is that many of them were done before the standard template was implemented. But the main reason I continue to prefer my format is that I find the results of the template unreadable. It crowds the page with irrelevant information "this is a definition", "these are examples", "these are keywords", and the actual part that needs to be highlighted, namely the word being defined, is lost in a sea of pointless headings. If and when the template is needed for some eventual automatic processing of the content, then I will be happy for the pages under my direct responsibility to be reformatted into ugly format, but for the time being please leave them in readable form. > Only at the end of everything else; please prioritize incomplete > cmavo over formatting issues. Yes, that's more concise. :) mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.