From bpfk-list+bncCK30vq5WEOiOmuQEGgT1I1T5@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 07 11:41:59 2010 Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot37D-0006MO-NY; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:59 -0700 Received: by pzk7 with SMTP id 7sf511962pzk.16 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MXuf1UKCGiR/UObcac7ln3V/Z3VWcNOgHnv6rHGwE1U=; b=bgSza7C7nRSQjDOANLgOU/mIgt2fNpA/E0ki/bBlfSAAVYvOyIgFfpQzdZHLeTK0Id b1fTgS7QNca2+suzC8b5F1ZVxOq56RbInrhSylG4voD4ejQejRfK+MNovflyZwNehAnI SqkD0ij0KibT9S5uSiKgLLYcz7OskTCrtM3QM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; b=RMAnfaC/itd4Gm7XP2MaqD0bpO0tz0DYoRo3s9EE53s/mdtqp+NMAQ0e36Kp+mbyQO EXQAZ8MthNxW5bU/wYZxNqSH3FihjcFKuXP6YbOf0pZtD+sKETBXOD912+bEh6zuBwrR tIXQtVlZ8ro3Z1uSablWcW0Dd5U4FGBtgVZoY= Received: by 10.115.81.14 with SMTP id i14mr368587wal.25.1283884904764; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.115.85.40 with SMTP id n40ls6122919wal.0.p; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.109.6 with SMTP id h6mr1655151wac.38.1283884904101; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.109.6 with SMTP id h6mr1655150wac.38.1283884904062; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (chain.digitalkingdom.org [64.81.66.169]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id r11si11387732waj.4.2010.09.07.11.41.43; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) client-ip=64.81.66.169; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot370-0006Lo-Ro for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:41:43 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 11:41:42 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work Message-ID: <20100907184142.GT5990@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 64.81.66.169 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:15:10PM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > 2010/9/7 Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> > >> Shouldn't you be doing red sections only? Black sections already have > >> someone assigned to them. (I'm not sure what the difference between > >> blue and black is. Blue are the ones worked on anonymously and black > >> are the ones that someone has claimed?) > > > > My understanding is, if it isn't green, it needs to be voted on, if it = isn't > > blue, it needs work done to it, and if it isn't either, it needs both. >=20 > That's not what the instructions on the page say. They say that > "blue" is for completed community work. It doesn't say that > completed individual work has to be blue. Almost all of my > sections are completed and waiting to be checkpointed, but they > are in black. At the top of the page it says that you should feel > free to work on _red_ sections, not black ones.=20 That's correct; please don't touch secitons with assigned shepherds that seem to have had significant work done on them. If no work has been done, just remove the shepherd's name and do as you like. -Robin --=20 http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.