From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDkmJvkBBoEE4tiCA@googlegroups.com Tue Sep 07 16:36:32 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ot7i4-0006Tp-Lo; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:32 -0700 Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26sf1477024wwf.16 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0PJdps0m7wRPV5OusDDUo9A8EgEe3MtQ1K1kkGNua3U=; b=Bbepj1vWi/AcTlioee1rF9ObgV1jaI7kUptec3dDcYFnm34tBZaqBLDtVQgIByKF2z YUYHMpKA0YALBC56G1H3kr81AUIIdrTfiAd/dLqvhm/LeRuHUDvTtTbekURNwJVjIFxV LZM05QUsFK+3cMwuOGvoGQ39kZT4PlSSXHOpQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=4Sx3XwN5b2Hnrwu5EAcdIRrxrLiktFfdZXOuO476203UgPmej/at1a5UwjQBXXIrxu lrnZA5CgUoU0EUJXJbUNyrAOu3kxufYYDCFwZur8zKXOb6awKfDVWqQ0NXD3/dUPGbna YszrGLJfC9HGz/Kz6MNrSnJC/5MaBOzR5FYaw= Received: by 10.216.144.25 with SMTP id m25mr1019415wej.9.1283902564148; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.198.162 with SMTP id v34ls2360719wen.3.p; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.11.143 with SMTP id 15mr340747wex.3.1283902563477; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.11.143 with SMTP id 15mr340746wex.3.1283902563453; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f180.google.com (mail-wy0-f180.google.com [74.125.82.180]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id s70si2455383weq.13.2010.09.07.16.36.02; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.180; Received: by mail-wy0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 40so8087031wyb.39 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.153.208 with SMTP id l16mr526912wbw.57.1283902562253; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.151.203 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:36:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100907232751.GH5990@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20100907184815.GV5990@digitalkingdom.org> <2582948a-ed7c-4c90-9319-dbd8caa242d0@u5g2000prn.googlegroups.com> <20100907232751.GH5990@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 20:36:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: BPFK work From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Everybody: don't worry about it too much. > > This is *not* the final format of *anything*. > > This will be used to do two things: > > 1. =A0Update the CLL and teaching materials. > > 2. =A0Update jbovlaste or something like it. > > In neither case will any format we pick be exactly correct. > > Seriously, it's not tha big a deal. I agree that it's not a big deal, but since it's possible that for example another three years pass by and we are still stuck at this stage, I would like to keep the page readable for these next three years. All I'm saying is, don't mess with the pages that are still readable. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.