From bpfk-list+bncCMqBsa7nERD2ncLkBBoEHo4q_A@googlegroups.com Wed Sep 15 02:22:05 2010 Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OvoBh-0000Ch-Hb; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:22:04 -0700 Received: by gwb11 with SMTP id 11sf5728566gwb.16 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=Ha3OuNxRj8ekhAzpIO5Sl1TFQQTxZOOQ4txxkuVql84=; b=AiEYGFyQLBZpCtxkPLR2ID+1Xr7duia6MYr8uw6HGA2N3Wr1dOdbZDM9Iv5Dso383X isan8kFslxDRKluUc2stGNhi7kswU6grTh1rwTUwU9zEDeK2GOMhkHbYuakl8FwKbguQ q+tUVF7sDRePN9DYxh8u0atMTrLqWVGO03Kh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from :to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=BCJufHVahULZzQaWhYhJhvV3U0HqMGy8mzdsiVjf3Ie29QE9v84K3yO1GVnKTdfe6e 5/f7BxledLYmzcIkC/AGIm70MHN9XutuWZHLrM2MlvUq9QvjXII2m3obOqppTkFLvTxt pElycRSAbUS8kbGhWgqvgFpRES65ZtJgiPx3w= Received: by 10.91.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr207911agi.33.1284542204590; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.193.98 with SMTP id dt34ls373261ibb.0.p; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.170.213 with SMTP id e21mr161730ibz.9.1284542198339; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.170.213 with SMTP id e21mr161729ibz.9.1284542198307; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f171.google.com (mail-iw0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e25si850381ibk.3.2010.09.15.02.16.37; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of oges007@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.171; Received: by mail-iw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 42so7800054iwn.30 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.161.68 with SMTP id q4mr1437637ibx.79.1284542196830; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.30.195 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 02:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:16:36 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: [bpfk] Mex Operators (VUhU) From: Ross Ogilvie To: bpfk-list X-Original-Sender: oges007@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of oges007@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=oges007@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450140b557531c049048c978 --0050450140b557531c049048c978 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 coi rodo I've basically finished my work on the bpfy section "Mex Operators". I have a few questions though: 1) How are the subcategories sorted? I know that it has no real significance but I just don't see the pattern and it's bugging me. VUhU0 are the two operators that don't do stuff. VUhU1 are the four arithmetic operations (+, -, x, /). But I just don't get the other ones. 2) Minimiscience started the working on the section back in April and seems to have been developing a type system (in a computer programming sense). It's my opinion that we should give minimal definitions and in the least technical way possible and leave the flexibility there for the operators to be adapted to more technical situations in the way users see most fit. But if s/he is around here somewhere and wants to speak up or clarify how extensive this system was to be, I'd enjoy to hear from you (or anyone really). The main practical difference this makes is whether we define operations for vectors and matrices or just numbers. 3) My definitions are rather terse. Is this the sort of thing that is wanted? Any other things criticisms? mu'o mi'e .ros -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en. --0050450140b557531c049048c978 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
coi rodo
I've basically finished my work on the bpfy section "Mex Operators". I have a few questions though:

1) How ar= e the subcategories sorted? I know that it has no real significance but I j= ust don't see the pattern and it's bugging me. VUhU0 are the two op= erators that don't do stuff. VUhU1 are the four arithmetic operations (= +, -, x, /). But I just don't get the other ones.

2) Minimiscience started the working on the section back in April and s= eems to have been developing a type system (in a computer programming sense= ). It's my opinion that we should give minimal definitions and in the l= east technical way possible and leave the flexibility there for the operato= rs to be adapted to more technical situations in the way users see most fit= . But if s/he is around here somewhere and wants to speak up or clarify how= extensive this system was to be, I'd enjoy to hear from you (or anyone= really). The main practical difference this makes is whether we define ope= rations for vectors and matrices or just numbers.

3) My definitions are rather terse. Is this the sort of thing that is w= anted? Any other things criticisms?

mu'o mi'e .ros

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--0050450140b557531c049048c978--