From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDHusnlBBoEi1IcvA@googlegroups.com Sun Oct 10 17:42:00 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P56Si-0007AC-G3; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:42:00 -0700 Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40sf681485wyb.16 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UxjurnhpJapRkr5Csduwt97tBH9sGZ2caVMVHCMiVBw=; b=XhNn+Jrm/kuYORjjDFDceC4ePVRLmixonO0y7r7m6r1Z//bkSwG6DlVMkoY8sbNeZu svqfjd6kLYA9hz11PvlFcBCOdh3ahEr/Enw9Oe3PwA3ZugNB5M0Hi/pWxsOggjrMsE1w /G7StPu3txTbQZXE7bBPKwWhOZZKF7OCf7Da8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QnzFDFIHgy10jgzROVTJKf6VuNigE0jmleaYSDW2/nkugu+TbbsNM9ULxPAjwsIAWr vcoZzHq6nITxp4dYW3Gl3ZHnRYbdkd7mb0fueXkh1jALxq6kxjSSHAeIgpsFnrR+u/5i Yqjdd+mPVGsnZzhpYOouBT2hSYaKcvphM0HoY= Received: by 10.216.237.231 with SMTP id y81mr78892weq.23.1286757703681; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:43 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.131.162 with SMTP id x34ls843101wbs.0.p; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.127.204 with SMTP id h12mr219794wbs.11.1286757702839; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.127.204 with SMTP id h12mr219793wbs.11.1286757702809; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f178.google.com (mail-wy0-f178.google.com [74.125.82.178]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id a37si2735720wba.7.2010.10.10.17.41.41; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.178; Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so2148738wyb.9 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.43.9 with SMTP id u9mr4961434wbe.41.1286757701555; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:41:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB2556C.9010707@lojban.org> References: <4CB0B239.50107@lojban.org> <4CB1F3EA.5000608@lojban.org> <4CB20ADF.6050500@lojban.org> <4CB223F7.1060402@lojban.org> <4CB2386E.2000301@lojban.org> <4CB2556C.9010707@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 21:41:41 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Robert LeChevalier wro= te: > Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> >> A: =A0ie pei melbi donri >> B: =A0nai > > Obviously then I would have to "explain" the text as "ungrammatical". =A0= %^) > > It doesn't parse as it is, and the machine grammar doesn't recognize the > possibility of multiple texts of that sort. So you think that conversation is invalid Lojban? Wow. > As B, I would feel obliged to use ".ienai go'i" if I wanted it to be > "correct" Lojban, though I guess just "ienai" would work just as well in > this instance. (If CLL has the above as an example, of course, I just say > "we didn't think about that when John wrote it") I didn't check if it has the exact example, but "nai" is a valid text. What do you think it's for? mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.