From bpfk-list+bncCKXkyaieBhDJr83lBBoEqOr4-w@googlegroups.com Mon Oct 11 11:30:50 2010 Received: from mail-vw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.212.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5N94-0003bj-2M; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:50 -0700 Received: by vws4 with SMTP id 4sf1352797vws.16 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:received:received:received :mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=jU6J1lwjYFXPc4b7sff9j27eBcOFIHJT9nVeQaKHNRQ=; b=HQnyVeuXHJAi/9LjED7cIK47W+ySzZjtolZUwJ9o4ClthkXx+CzzBkQF9Xw3rU85Fb ny7i6xJiLO8eNozfgyrDfzkIuqC3fPJ7LCtNXOLe1XthesKfLJF0QfMFQu2TGFzoQdGu ps/YAK1vAej7D8yGtT3pOjry5HzOGRFf8/XWw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=nZ814skakT/Pat3qHoMFvVbSrD+FzkIWyUFM6cQToFmYs13jbb8xASdpJ8GPjRtEiO pGQoaL6ZQItQpu7OomJUQmuQgzDuFTSOSgT4saub/B6djPNGMzKG2Vud6IH4JVhUENN7 0zKl+K8cD29ka2mdl+YvTnWeqDu6wAod/33Zk= Received: by 10.220.178.134 with SMTP id bm6mr196073vcb.59.1286821833399; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:33 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.220.127.94 with SMTP id f30ls527555vcs.1.p; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.183.73 with SMTP id cf9mr1552212vcb.27.1286821832525; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.183.73 with SMTP id cf9mr1552210vcb.27.1286821832475; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f177.google.com (mail-qy0-f177.google.com [209.85.216.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id f24si1082130vcm.9.2010.10.11.11.30.32; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of daniel@brockman.se) client-ip=209.85.216.177; Received: by mail-qy0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 4so763006qyk.15 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.84.20 with SMTP id h20mr5373369qcl.6.1286821832127; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com (mail-qy0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x9sm1504359qco.10.2010.10.11.11.30.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so1318705qyk.16 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.185.65 with SMTP id cn1mr4813669qab.125.1286821828230; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:30:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.79.145 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:29:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CB355E6.7020705@lojban.org> References: <4CB2335F.7000606@lojban.org> <4CB253D0.1020806@lojban.org> <4CB355E6.7020705@lojban.org> From: Daniel Brockman Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:29:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: daniel@brockman.se X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.216.177 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of daniel@brockman.se) smtp.mail=daniel@brockman.se Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Jorge> Where does this notion that conversations are single parsable Jorge> units rather than an exchange of parsable units come from? lojbab> There is no formally defined plural of parsable unit. The moment you lojbab> claim to talk about multiple texts, you have gone beyond the formal lojbab> language definition. The question is whether, and how, we wish to lojbab> extend the formal definition of Lojban beyond a single text. Intriguing.... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.