From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCwgc7lBBoEVTD0Og@googlegroups.com Mon Oct 11 14:25:25 2010
Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCwgc7lBBoEVTD0Og@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P5Prx-0003kV-T9; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:25 -0700
Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16sf274332fxm.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=1s8/sKoC8Rk457xNb+2UwewPW6FSwl4v9aGcgxo0PZw=;
        b=qR1duopa7CRJ4S2NlNibqB4nEZQLMzYDZFv8AGs+hd8TF9Fo6saYWlg2AWOUBIK7p2
         BNRkz8tzUJZ+HqqE3DZxfwN2xErN7iSyc6CYf1JNEYA7ebZlivVFKZkYthi2etlVP6E3
         2bxbSzoDS7zk6p+Ez8TT2nhQB8mcamMatLGsg=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=4J4MS50GGQ22yufjTfALk4NDqLwLzxu4xFrA8h3uOdeojAdxxG01t3JDzrUPrAeZO1
         OKz2YVx45CFPEWE/9WCwMZhLOZTa5gNmrJWQMPD8hhcbD8i3pLqhU0bQC2wlzkifEYRn
         o7+ww+VQZGaJ8uw0Hc3TsCreezXuuq9W3pjbo=
Received: by 10.223.91.81 with SMTP id l17mr98312fam.25.1286832304790;
        Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.223.32.142 with SMTP id c14ls1025587fad.2.p; Mon, 11 Oct 2010
 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.119.77 with SMTP id y13mr473984faq.1.1286832304295;
        Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.119.77 with SMTP id y13mr473982faq.1.1286832304274;
        Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f45.google.com (mail-fx0-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id d11si1788576fan.4.2010.10.11.14.25.03;
        Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.45;
Received: by mail-fx0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 9so721485fxm.18
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.132.132 with SMTP id 4mr426895hbr.47.1286832302994; Mon,
 11 Oct 2010 14:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.239.162.66 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTim2HXc8m+piP1X7TBZoX6d48NvtWr4hUR9fto6O@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2R1tYqwGzuL1oLN448q-aB3BHEcB4Z9h+5FBs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikfmXw8qE7L6e9d1KA=vcE3+_2-x3oB9sU-tY3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimsi5eFPPfbLFg7jgDnA-3rNXX+6UkMw852CBMk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinaNdo3eTkWBwdKgUYHobmOUPMKNd1zHkAC_KzG@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikROXvZ0J_KtzpkqxjMhXYVGY2WkBoWbidHJUoG@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB0B239.50107@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTimzz=Exgf-94tnkebibZs8ZhtmO_Z9meeorSLKj@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB1F3EA.5000608@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTi=-z=KfdA3EQYF-g2Ab9v=PXCHZGr0g=17RBF3j@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB20ADF.6050500@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTikJQAkx145XeQBC=f5KBq0wyLz_yd4wgkCH8Bbk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinFLROKSf7WLn3r82hHVLGUjTUx6VLG=MereADY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimU6eie6HXqfVYWCKEYxBEn=uvyRk+oRbsCSyGv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=5rsT0HCwd+aO+Pyt-2r6Q06jxss0zk2e+B+LE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimVM9COtdvBy6oH66imQOmMWXbumv3GQjYw8JhG@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB2335F.7000606@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTi=eC0yrzcPj8DLqRVK+dnzQgt+-diwO0aM7rrj-@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CB253D0.1020806@lojban.org>
	<AANLkTikDa_qf9vK0wEeu-LsGmby0dVg5Mc7aAsMOPCEy@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim5UyGXXc5m0aBySDaUPCXYrBh=81fyRz3om19q@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikJs4ti8DLAJ7HyOrdSdK4yxdf2QTWffdGgLw=S@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim7rNwE0jFa9vuNZoobFh0vpKt5wO9Gw7XAwpAc@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikbuZNVhZqs85t4WyWKYmLsxT4oY6a6i38Efakh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinzdG4_by2tPeJfbSy0FPnZ0Nn9yro2NOUK-sB5@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinEzbZDTGcojU-MpoxJtvzOyOVg=Uq__2JL5ECR@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTim2HXc8m+piP1X7TBZoX6d48NvtWr4hUR9fto6O@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:25:02 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcoKbyUe+J_Sk4JwuPGkzs4smfJS9qBDf98LbV@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.45 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Whether or not to begin an utterance with {.i} was never the point of
> discussion. Whether or not {.i} is required for an utterance to be
> grammatical was never the point of the discussion. I am not, was not, and
> will not be making any "proposal" to change the grammar of Lojban to require
> {.i} in such cases as it is currently optional.
>
> The POINT of the discussion is, whether an utterance from a new speaker is a
> new "text" or not.

If by "text" you mean "the chunk of input you feed to the parser to
check for grammaticality", then yes, normally an utterance from a new
speaker is a new "text" (there may be rare exceptions).

If by "text" you mean something else. I don't know, it depends what
you mean by it.

What do you mean by "text"?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.