From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRD9kNTlBBoE6aSxSg@googlegroups.com Tue Oct 12 18:17:01 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P5pxi-0002x1-IQ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:17:01 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf1283135wwe.16 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Uvw0Mb5QTkcLt3vL5TsNALwf9NB9n/ZZesvi84I6Xc=; b=OUzq44SIacHF9nQ5K1xdGco+WTmomzkTkejAtbVbRxBOuQ094+Hf9xlznSweC1PSXY ORL89hNya4RNIDnIeI+T7UEfazKQy3otW79iZHd0mKW38FxGKpkNt712pDknFgVZ2iQK sZymvotb9//eO5HAYSMAO+JL1Kvyrh5sKFAAg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OYFM/yeDiTyhScoyxuJkbTH6BaS7a24meIKxVM7P0giuypc36KDx72AFG4ej7coCcn pyKe2oFsvat6KhAasNW/BvFleV/M31GDWs8TjPu6muZmZtSUeP4tGAJvO0EuK0+3U98E Ah68g4Oy+rBnweVpiAZRcr1qj5blEw2USRU5c= Received: by 10.216.237.73 with SMTP id x51mr661026weq.19.1286932605611; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.242.202 with SMTP id i52ls221150wer.0.p; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.163.209 with SMTP id a59mr30902wel.3.1286932604830; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.163.209 with SMTP id a59mr30901wel.3.1286932604776; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f175.google.com (mail-wy0-f175.google.com [74.125.82.175]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id l2si224295weq.13.2010.10.12.18.16.43; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.175; Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1088417wyb.34 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.72.213 with SMTP id n21mr7916333wbj.66.1286932603587; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 18:16:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CB2335F.7000606@lojban.org> <4CB253D0.1020806@lojban.org> <4CB3576C.2000009@lojban.org> <4CB48045.9050503@lojban.org> <4CB4A74F.9040003@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:16:43 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.175 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Brockman wrote= : > Okay, for the sake of argument, if we treat this > > =A0 =A0A: do klama ma > =A0 =A0B: lo zarci > > as an informal Lojban meta-textual object, while at the same > time declare this to be a well-defined Lojban "conversation", > > =A0 =A0do klama ma fa'ai lo zarci > > then what do we do about this? > > =A0 la xorxes cu cusku lu do klama ma fa'ai lo zarci > > That's one "conversation", but is it one or two "texts"? That will depend on whether "lu" can quote whole conversations or just texts, like now. If just texts, then the elidable "li'u" will automatically be inserted before "fa'ai". mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.