From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDe8b7lBBoEJrj8pw@googlegroups.com Fri Oct 08 17:35:57 2010
Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDe8b7lBBoEJrj8pw@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P4NPm-00068r-Ff; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:57 -0700
Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17sf308463fxm.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=qgp5n7nN1ciaKAbL2h8QiXys9Gz2vUCgmhUHOc5qNTg=;
        b=dF38/hilhwLsKEM7cCVHwVS0WGYEeeH7+FXprUh+VAkAhRQ6Unq+pV/dt+HdSh6HLo
         GlKefQflZCJnYeunXlyAvNfOOj2LLOSDufTKx6DsOCGTCpdaKvnrWpWishlXd7t2V0K5
         skMOTZTMRH8Yw40LQuApm4lBRKSCiqoEFwIow=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Z4+NYreyEjAvNx3KWqkpTzYgl2cjWkpg9Oz2li7GPAyvRCeuwzAI+APKxKvDsenZ2E
         lmopMcM3nrN0R4HkLTW1tVfQ2A8MW9z7AFV9SugooHiiugMu7fqPLrf1T/nGjaD/h9H7
         3xZrjkjLzZZttExM1Uy0RBYec5eqNfIzeX9O0=
Received: by 10.223.91.65 with SMTP id l1mr136715fam.43.1286584542193;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.204.29.18 with SMTP id o18ls526107bkc.3.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010
 17:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.80.146 with SMTP id t18mr59375bkk.8.1286584541571;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.80.146 with SMTP id t18mr59374bkk.8.1286584541549;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id g12si822961bkl.5.2010.10.08.17.35.40;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.44 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.44;
Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so1305843fxm.17
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.187.205 with SMTP id m13mr207015hbh.127.1286584539212;
 Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.239.162.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 17:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjOXsxMKa6LYbBBMzf=hT4-dtC7nGdbEi5MY8v@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2R1tYqwGzuL1oLN448q-aB3BHEcB4Z9h+5FBs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTincpLaVC8qAkVv=rhoY-OS4zVvUBE-FLyU-=km-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=9Gq718J_z=wL=d=jCVFFhhxZKgmE7K6KHzfqh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinEWipK_Bfpxvq79R7A8L9N4-poLYRgQspGNshp@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimhpiKfpJHajxQYfLLdhxOrzV33zy4HhfdK1Msk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinGyEz71X9iLYY-bHMAomQP=6TAvJgWTBhhUMnE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCAcSqCZPUXCZFQFPkzimGH7a7fE72xTisiQSn@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinKGVWW7tfi2RnZEmAAfxpcDWbNdEa8mDoWzf04@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimzONSvL1p5p9HD0VNwxBXBHc4UJA4jm9js=ZeL@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=cV1C=zkjUXPShBZ5JE0MgHFmce+qecR9y+J4m@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinrQHWvVgw7fVKtpwedSqwkQ8E85cN44nWWkT-=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikzPOvqPJctcAEsGZ3foib_Lc9w=oqD3w3GS07+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimi+KZ9RV0zoLnD_nN-vo3KshCQdpAu8ma20TZM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinNXCzAc_+_f=9jSoG2O-Mup1i8T3bPECE85XYv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik4+xEqqGdodPE1B=XvJGoL1o0saavdchE8aNWY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi==Q=kQm6ZFWySFQSu3cT4pGOEBtk_-pZZ2F7A_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimx_LkkfjE3LgtK7rXcE05T9rSH1nNDKexDUczk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinz1db56tSt5u8_A0684cRAxgtw1k_uFcsMb26W@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjOXsxMKa6LYbBBMzf=hT4-dtC7nGdbEi5MY8v@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:35:39 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTimC7b5dj4nLKgeYwzajwpPwdddWKV+RMY652cJS@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.44 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/8 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> If the second line is by a second person, it's like a new text. It
>> doesn't have to be taken as one single text.
>
> I don't think it /has/ to. I merely think it /should/.

"Should" or "could"?

> For the following
> reason:
>
> lo verba cu cusku lu .i mi nelci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. li'u .i lo vy mam=
ta
> cu cusku lu mlatu li'u .i lo verba ku .e lo mamta cu cusku lu .i mi nelci=
 lo
> mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. mlatu li'u

"lo verba jo'u lo mamta". With ".e" it's false, since it expands to:

lo verba cu cusku lu .i mi nelci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. mlatu li'u
.ije lo mamta cu cusku lu .i mi nelci lo mi cnino .yyyyyyyy. mlatu
li'u

Anyway, I'm lost as to the point you want to make here. Sure, one
possible interpretation of the mother's text is as completing the
child's text. So?

mu'o mi'e xorxes

--=20
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "=
BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg=
roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l=
ist?hl=3Den.