From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDlktzlBBoEz4mm_Q@googlegroups.com Thu Oct 14 06:45:31 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P6O7Y-0007U9-42; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:30 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf2208312wwe.16 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=ZvmeN5OF2UrAhGfNd2vJ15jZkdMUSx28q2f4HK2cCOs=; b=NR6tQrETfrMenPQVU4sixbVPilnsGpYEP7dfBdfZyaU9h48t967jD8BHi+CqSM1eLm omjzv71WiKZCCxUfe+p4gZmJ1cZksGecihXV1a6tSkWhvRiVXHssMZmuy40l7/SQ41m0 iPQkumbtOXTAfa96I62tSyigsbuJ4V8GbgvaA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=vwpy1MWmkbtrM06pVkxUe8c7sNceWctTZQ+f8HHJ9UxUzM7stU9tRF44lDaBma7yEO B1nvVqMlegrHIzDXfu05s4rSwDS76V5jGDhaRbZo7nBxTrgm+PPH/6LkEd05wFH56TZu /rRLhQQkBqutkQDY+twnaPfsyuSTxNsOsNX64= Received: by 10.216.242.7 with SMTP id h7mr750081wer.6.1287063909947; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:09 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.168.134 with SMTP id u6ls831342wby.1.p; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr483508wbx.29.1287063908821; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.158.11 with SMTP id d11mr483507wbx.29.1287063908788; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id w33si2721818wbd.2.2010.10.14.06.45.07; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.53; Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so5622466wwc.34 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.143 with SMTP id s15mr9788785wbw.154.1287063903200; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:45:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <70c95ba0-9cc9-4639-8e30-5e486d25cf2b@q3g2000pra.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:45:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] Re: O HAI I FIXT UR LODGEBANZ From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Lindar wrote: > > It's really down to writing a more understandable definition, using > the writing/blue/long examples, and explaining why each is correct. Writing the definition in Lojban should probably be the first step. > {jei} is next! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA*BOISTEROUS ANIME > LAUGH*HAHAHAHAHAHAHA~~~~! "jei" is in a sense easier than "ni", although the issues ar essentially the same. There are two competing definitions for "jei": (1) jei = du'u xu kau (2) x1 jei (bridi) kei x2 = x1 se jetlai lo du'u (bridi) kei x2 (1) is how everybody uses it, (2) is a literal reading of the cmavo list definition. I went with (2) in the Lojban-Lojban for jbovlaste, but I don't really care one way or the other. I just don't need "jei". See: http://jbovlaste.lojban.org//dict/jei http://jbovlaste.lojban.org//dict/jetlai mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.