From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRC5-eflBBoEJYnb6Q@googlegroups.com Sat Oct 16 12:28:10 2010 Received: from mail-wy0-f189.google.com ([74.125.82.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7CQH-0007xX-PF; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:28:10 -0700 Received: by wyb39 with SMTP id 39sf1116648wyb.16 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jb4FgOTjUhMUp8KhnLWho85tsQs3vv8I0E5Awu+uUyc=; b=uizkoq9yMqyAhWs/t1BN7zHvWAn4OamDWDOcneoD9crpye2K3wtDRkIFZaDVdGqBFt IiZ3HpR+/78Ze++SG8JL5BMBfLrwlJ7A/rQYFQ3TmQnwABt6CRgZe6PS3/VZ8+MyvZTo biBRbLZIyVSXDhFKwVdE0IzTh90HGk10tl+Mo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=azOSP2QkPp0cu/2b6oqgmG3LfmLdWnJ5YLBYN7CT1FniDgIJNfPe1ypeqxI6xOBVmT tafhBrSpVRWNao/Q7ohxdnPALUx7M4scwNmXAMZkhdp/tPQLtm/96TzUiDT4c8I/MCOh gIvRxuzY4Q+BysuUjGm08TCCitdLG5mkMkbTo= Received: by 10.216.231.154 with SMTP id l26mr193054weq.9.1287257273531; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:53 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.208.4 with SMTP id p4ls315351weo.2.p; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.165.85 with SMTP id d63mr129432wel.10.1287257272827; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.165.85 with SMTP id d63mr129431wel.10.1287257272795; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f176.google.com (mail-wy0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id m20si2513381weq.3.2010.10.16.12.27.51; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.176; Received: by mail-wy0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 36so989878wyb.7 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.153.11 with SMTP id i11mr2598407wbw.150.1287257269321; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:27:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101016180339.GG25393@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20101014071951.GU24066@digitalkingdom.org> <20101016180339.GG25393@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:27:49 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] What I'm going to do. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.176 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:28:32AM -0300, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> >> Every January 1st. the BPFK publishes a very concise "State of the >> Language" report, that looks something like this: > > Works for me. =A0You gonna tell them about your other idea? =A0:D As you pointed out, the BPFK currently has a very informal structure. The only structured part for now is the jatna position. Therefore, until another structure develops, the yearly "State of the Language" report will be issued by the jatna in the name of the BPFK, with the final decision on its contents fully at the jatna's discretion. Of course we all expect and know that the jatna will take the job seriously and make whatever consultations they deem necessary before acting, but the final decision is the jatna's alone. They might for example prepare a draft report two weeks before January 1st, ask for comments, and then make their decision based on the feedback they receive, or whatever other method they find suitable to prepare the report. The report is about the "State of the Language", not about the "Final Definition of the Language from Here to Eternity", so there's no reason to worry if it's not perfect in every minor detail. mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.