From bpfk-list+bncCIbHkKSnHBC6rJzmBBoEThWlEQ@googlegroups.com Tue Oct 26 10:56:26 2010 Received: from mail-gw0-f61.google.com ([74.125.83.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PAnl1-0004mI-OX; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:26 -0700 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20sf8020823gwj.16 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:x-vr-score :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from :subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=06T05XcS6o2G5m/0E02uLhv3p3IoJhf8O2JuGvYnzJM=; b=ELEemR3kCWiFBunJzX0E8kj9K20Lg/Lp5T1VklZ3RkMPhCkzsD/qtx/WdUlgIQ7Tns i2dupYxadTs+Y/2RntLcDX/WM3uujtL6pkDgJJXbbKtt5LrDFq2dHGwPxy5u5I58hYtC Z4eOO5gn27FL6OgTV7U7uYYnDLf3opKjJfpaY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-vr-score:x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score :message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-archive:sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=UzYX5juYXVPmc29SUUIitqawdxMXwkBYXL3KlqcxVOOJy5gQfIyVsEMV/1Gkgo3lSx Eu5Yp2Ys5z7j37FfI0V7MIP0VoPQjalT5fU6cIXElt4cQIihFwbCV9PnOL9MdfsLEH+g +ApIdcrLmknhv0alcRXU+vVieMC975XJeYjh8= Received: by 10.101.218.6 with SMTP id v6mr114495anq.25.1288115770785; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.101.164.26 with SMTP id r26ls2434026ano.4.p; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.195.18 with SMTP id s18mr1111432anf.51.1288115770182; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.195.18 with SMTP id s18mr1111431anf.51.1288115770163; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao103.cox.net (eastrmmtao103.cox.net [68.230.240.9]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id x32si3551640ana.3.2010.10.26.10.56.09; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of noras@cox.net designates 68.230.240.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=68.230.240.9; Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao103.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101026175609.HTBL25033.eastrmmtao103.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:56:09 -0400 Received: from NORA-HP.cox.net ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id PVw11f0083Xcbvq02Vw9Nm; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:56:09 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Of5FRk7D4fcJlrWbzxPvWNsT1UhKEYt7m7ky24PLP4c= c=1 sm=1 a=mTweW3EOjfIA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=x6OyWa93VL-5hsdVi6IA:9 a=_pRG3AUHoEjh7R_RuOT3CTw7ycAA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=6vBUqgnJJ_Mu9WAm:21 a=rAwUgqLR1LHkxtW6:21 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20101026134742.01f61b78@cox.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:56:00 -0400 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com From: Nora LeChevalier Subject: Re: [bpfk] CLL errata check: lujvo scoring In-Reply-To: <20101026063932.GL1105@digitalkingdom.org> References: <20101026061117.GJ1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101026063822.GK1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101026063932.GL1105@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Sender: noras@cox.net X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of noras@cox.net designates 68.230.240.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=noras@cox.net Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed At 02:39 AM 10/26/2010, Robin wrote: >Oh, also, it means the actual formally written out immediately >before is wrong, and possibly some of the surrounding verbiage. > >It also makes negative lujvo possible, which seems icky. > >-Robin [snip] > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:33:56AM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > > > At the last minute we (which I think means Nora) decided to subtract > > > everything from 32500 so that higher values = better lujvo. 12.1 > > > obviously got missed, so your fix is just the wrong way round. Looking at calculations in my lujvo-making program ( I presume this is what you're referring to?), higher is better score: In the program, a max of 6 pieces was handled. Luj.LujScore := (32 - length(Luj.Lujvo)) * 1000 + ApostTot * 500 + (5 - HyphenCount) * 100 + TypeTot * 10 + VowelTot; So, since each piece if 5 characters or less, max length of lujvo is 30, so negative won't happen. Note: TypeTot based on sum of type-scores of component rafsi (higher number is "better"): Rafsi Type-score ------- ---------------- Cvc 5 Ccv 7 Cvv 8 Cvhv 6 Cvcc 2 Ccvc 4 Cvccv 1 Ccvcv 3 mi'e .noras. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.