From bpfk-list+bncCPrlgoD04bGDVBCw86DmBBoELfhuxg@googlegroups.com Wed Oct 27 07:40:05 2010 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PB7AT-0004DQ-B5; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:40:04 -0700 Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13sf171547fxm.16 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:mime-version:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=RvocXR2yPqeMTLLmTLkQ4hyZ66s+WLmC68J9cNW2aRU=; b=Sot/oPWIFmguGCvSFjwrWN2Rk5d0pBpter5+iyaIsAys1UszUaTNRiAjlORmR1YQiE j7Fxodqzwa6Gw7ZaDBAdIZ4IlN0KkZ6CKeXMNBad6Wo+n9cI3HQ+0/l+T/KDtBDPa9Tn TPZPom3a6Wp2VguH0Uczjcz1kO/ioyocbZ/vk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=ts4rjMVRM9IKRfrDabzrS9bUimpHgaBJFZlE1vBh3lEEcEHWVdfc9IjTRvWXSu7zM1 HFfc+IIHafCIZAjWR2LMcq0uYZO2qPbZNJ0X0iX9o+8Y2YjJUh+ZPYvgfyPLzmC+1LiZ r+kWvuFJij1Doi7nGLoUPg2zDxv4LdBC6JOPI= Received: by 10.223.107.195 with SMTP id c3mr141264fap.4.1288190384773; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:44 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.223.59.212 with SMTP id m20ls265014fah.3.p; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.70.136 with SMTP id d8mr153271faj.9.1288190383969; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.70.136 with SMTP id d8mr153270faj.9.1288190383953; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-fx0-f47.google.com (mail-fx0-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 2si691523fat.6.2010.10.27.07.39.42; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of philip.newton@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.161.47; Received: by mail-fx0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 3so859127fxm.20 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.74.202 with SMTP id v10mr2422225faj.114.1288190382862; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.118.7 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:39:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101026061117.GJ1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101026063822.GK1105@digitalkingdom.org> <20101026063932.GL1105@digitalkingdom.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20101026134742.01f61b78@cox.net> From: Philip Newton Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 16:39:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] CLL errata check: lujvo scoring To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: philip.newton@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of philip.newton@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=philip.newton@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 de'i li 2010:10:27 la xorxes cu cusku zoi .zoi. > The algorithm doesn't take consonant clusters into account, so I'm not > sure how often it gives a choice that people find preferable. It > prefers "kixsku" to "ki'asku" for example, just because it's slightly > shorter, even though it has a "difficult" consonant cluster. Are we > going to devise a better algorithm? I think it would be better to give > priority to syllable structure rather than just letter count. .zoi. I'm also slightly miffed that it considers "gimste" to be better than "gi'uste", even though "gi'uste" is much more parallel to "ma'oste". But of course such "semantic parallels" are impossible to cast into an algorithm. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- Philip Newton -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.