From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDolr_lBBoEIUg1KA@googlegroups.com Fri Oct 08 18:55:03 2010
Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDolr_lBBoEIUg1KA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1P4OeK-0001SS-Ac; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:55:03 -0700
Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf384544wwe.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received
         :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to
         :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=KMUbojAM0nOM7L1R3SYj9TNxwoiOW8BrprInfWQVyds=;
        b=YUtn3CdzMFXLSI1LG09+jJOgVTO/Y+0Xb7wvQ+c95YhPBKMvCReBO7hlqQH+5rFrdF
         UzWlo8pIwl6DkTnviptYC2Jk5NNUVsJe2k89apOwoDQtPzlS0HXDq16xKNMryMGnHrpV
         awPCpOLfX6xIGcMRD/9aGdCHr3DiTkavx1hO0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe
         :list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        b=vC81NothtXqklXPC0/5XJrZpW9MyjKD+NlOkYxxSNo+CPMviKqwrFoY2Qal3TQaY5N
         F6iq1OTeCHfxkyFvYLasD7bdT7YLtqCHlu//GjsRv0GElkulSnp1JmyTHFQdkSAhDdHn
         qy2uJrB3sJOnad7NX4OjTvYhpVLUp/0IlXHrA=
Received: by 10.216.145.167 with SMTP id p39mr651929wej.25.1286589288367;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.227.3.19 with SMTP id 19ls561501wbl.3.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010
 18:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.12.208 with SMTP id y16mr131807wby.16.1286589287628;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.12.208 with SMTP id y16mr131806wby.16.1286589287593;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1si971391wbc.4.2010.10.08.18.54.46;
        Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.182 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.182;
Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so2587007wyb.27
        for <bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.135.3 with SMTP id l3mr2573190wbt.103.1286589286377; Fri,
 08 Oct 2010 18:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 18:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikAXHhBOU7mVVupcVK-a3XzXsSJZ8i0z-xxu+tn@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=2R1tYqwGzuL1oLN448q-aB3BHEcB4Z9h+5FBs@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTincpLaVC8qAkVv=rhoY-OS4zVvUBE-FLyU-=km-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=9Gq718J_z=wL=d=jCVFFhhxZKgmE7K6KHzfqh@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinEWipK_Bfpxvq79R7A8L9N4-poLYRgQspGNshp@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org>
	<AANLkTimhpiKfpJHajxQYfLLdhxOrzV33zy4HhfdK1Msk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinGyEz71X9iLYY-bHMAomQP=6TAvJgWTBhhUMnE@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimCAcSqCZPUXCZFQFPkzimGH7a7fE72xTisiQSn@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinKGVWW7tfi2RnZEmAAfxpcDWbNdEa8mDoWzf04@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimzONSvL1p5p9HD0VNwxBXBHc4UJA4jm9js=ZeL@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=cV1C=zkjUXPShBZ5JE0MgHFmce+qecR9y+J4m@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinrQHWvVgw7fVKtpwedSqwkQ8E85cN44nWWkT-=@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikzPOvqPJctcAEsGZ3foib_Lc9w=oqD3w3GS07+@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimi+KZ9RV0zoLnD_nN-vo3KshCQdpAu8ma20TZM@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinNXCzAc_+_f=9jSoG2O-Mup1i8T3bPECE85XYv@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTik4+xEqqGdodPE1B=XvJGoL1o0saavdchE8aNWY@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi==Q=kQm6ZFWySFQSu3cT4pGOEBtk_-pZZ2F7A_@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimx_LkkfjE3LgtK7rXcE05T9rSH1nNDKexDUczk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTinz1db56tSt5u8_A0684cRAxgtw1k_uFcsMb26W@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimjOXsxMKa6LYbBBMzf=hT4-dtC7nGdbEi5MY8v@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimC7b5dj4nLKgeYwzajwpPwdddWKV+RMY652cJS@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=eDLMoqz7UKajDehXxEKYROX6fwYdPwT9LGE=o@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimE=ynAZ5cVrsUXB6ULrgfj8ts_QknS6QM=hFgz@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikfmXw8qE7L6e9d1KA=vcE3+_2-x3oB9sU-tY3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTimsi5eFPPfbLFg7jgDnA-3rNXX+6UkMw852CBMk@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikAXHhBOU7mVVupcVK-a3XzXsSJZ8i0z-xxu+tn@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:54:46 -0300
Message-ID: <AANLkTikprjxvJs=s768yhcVO9z7dpzKwZ7W8wbJq5Cp3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.182 as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I can't think of any way to say this succintly, so please excuse any
> rambling. What I'm trying to get at is, unless the new speaker begins with
> {.i}, or by extension {ni'o} and related, the new speaker is to be taken as
> continuing the previous speaker's sentence. If, however, the new speaker
> does begin with {.i} or related, then /regardless/ of what the previous
> speaker said, it is a new sentence.

That would entail a huge change in the grammar. In fact I'm not sure
it's even doable, you are essentially giving a different grammar to I
and NIhO when they are the first word in a new voice than when they
are not the first word in a new voice.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.