From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDhpr_lBBoE3EO95g@googlegroups.com Fri Oct 08 19:29:04 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4PBF-0003Wj-P8; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:29:04 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf386756wwe.16 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=dZtPLBGpAKjFKO7nTUAyhRPPoSjyxioybwTFwDambsE=; b=IMtH5KGk4cimAF5QXiFbCE9RvA4pukdimOr7wd6LCrT4O5RM62TdwGF1S5V99X4GAv 62ZQxwUmDvE04IeE6JvF3PVCJ31GtQ4qBKaOBVEpatoK0eqyqWxM/wZtCYwxi8AHymkD JMqpHBJk0APcb+qnzNGfJ2Q8XoERmkBsCrsLU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=5GJZNEilTTnYAMaTYYTG3xAtoLsYjWsGxEcyIPhftgIdBvHPR/k+ltJrj7Zi9TUaU5 99qclXAV+Zsl4fAf5PGPRbqTdnXyP+C2taqgoW3I9tx4r4IP+Dt9ZCgG3ssSbhA9FCiZ wPe5PoDo3W/JKBGhgEEoQL+Rjm8C3AbvIp4Eo= Received: by 10.216.237.9 with SMTP id x9mr390596weq.26.1286591329193; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:49 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.216.242.202 with SMTP id i52ls685132wer.0.p; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.15.227 with SMTP id f77mr165347wef.3.1286591328525; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.15.227 with SMTP id f77mr165346wef.3.1286591328488; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f47.google.com (mail-ww0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1si997636wbc.4.2010.10.08.19.28.47; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.47; Received: by mail-ww0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 26so1966001wwf.28 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.141.77 with SMTP id l13mr3144742wbu.77.1286591327265; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 23:28:47 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > It is the only method I can think of that maintain unambiguity while > preserving the ability to continue someone else's sentence. I'm sure Robin will be ecstatic if you ask him to modify the grammar so that I/NIhO in a new voice have a different grammar than in the current voice. > So unless > someone has a better suggestion, it's either that or it is not possible to > continue someone else's sentence, ever. The latter will cause all Lojbanic > twins to hate you, btw. zo'o Deciding where a new text starts (and where it ends) is necessarily a pragmatic endeavor. If the twins want to be parsed as if only one person was speaking that's fine, but it's a pragmatic decision that has to be made by the listener every time. mu'o mi'e xorxes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.