From bpfk-list+bncCMHEmaCOBhD5mMTlBBoEPTbunA@googlegroups.com Sat Oct 09 17:44:56 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4k21-00041K-N3; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:56 -0700 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7sf1161797ywo.16 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=3WOIEv3g5ZtxAQH3eFTj6O5lHqQK5wlARDp0Jiwl1yY=; b=vOirDcJrz6+mbJfLHEeObbOrXbTM8DG3A8o82TyHQU6gDVUvFIj/J1mDJ/C/yuKRee p8BALqu9ZT5Rdac5ujPsEhUIVPnfvtdQqnSOd4aZuZmBXBDtYM7LIjmc9+cq+LiCYA/s 0z03aFiNyGe9/YJg2T+kzhpu3VFcFTsklgVNc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=HMlGtmgDOfozoYMcTYpA9TyKQPwi/dV7OsfnkSSKr1yUqEZ6YT+1TQNoyELTFTAQec 5B0Xzhot0TCTzr4hrKNUj+X5gkh1acW9FKNdZGYztdK2nRVS3dQU4ZJ+T75jtf3WGP7P Ex9f0OlYaVrY803U7YhxZS1oTsmjEPedKG5Pc= Received: by 10.91.34.32 with SMTP id m32mr154966agj.49.1286671481185; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:41 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.231.55.74 with SMTP id t10ls1093420ibg.3.p; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.161.81 with SMTP id q17mr1206532ibx.12.1286671480904; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.161.81 with SMTP id q17mr1206529ibx.12.1286671480874; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-iw0-f177.google.com (mail-iw0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id e4si3278326ibc.4.2010.10.09.17.44.39; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.177; Received: by iwn5 with SMTP id 5so57513iwn.8 for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.167.130 with SMTP id q2mr3494965iby.163.1286671477604; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 17:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.206.68 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Oct 2010 17:44:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20100903032539.GY5990@digitalkingdom.org> <8136604407292225759@unknownmsgid> <6632159152572093565@unknownmsgid> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:44:37 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work From: Jonathan Jones To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: eyeonus@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of eyeonus@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=eyeonus@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0050450143dd5d819b0492388c8d --0050450143dd5d819b0492388c8d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > 2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas > >> > >> Right. Of course that means that now there's no way to continue A's > >> text with a true "nai"... > > > > "di'ai .y. nai" ? > > The parser basically ignores ".y", but I suppose the pre-parser can be > told not to ignore it. > > Now, if B is truly hesitating after "di'ai", as they realize they > didn't want to actually say that word... > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > Okay, that idea doesn't really work. The only other idea I can think of is "li'o .ie" - "di'ai si .ienai li'o" --=20 mu'o mi'e .aionys. .i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe lo pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu d= o zo'o (Come to the Dot Side! Luke, I am your father. :D ) --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den. --0050450143dd5d819b0492388c8d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas <= ;jjllambias@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/10/9 Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com>
>>
>> Right. Of course that means that now there= 's no way to continue A's
>> text with a true "nai"...
>
> "di'ai .y. nai" ?

The parser basically ignores ".y", but I suppose the pre-parser c= an be
told not to ignore it.

Now, if B is truly hesitating after "di'ai", as they realize = they
didn't want to actually say that word...

mu'o mi'e xorxes

Okay, that idea doe= sn't really work. The only other idea I can think of is "li'o = .ie" - "di'ai si .ienai li'o"
=A0
-- <= br> mu'o mi'e .aionys.

.i.a'o.e'e ko cmima le bende pe l= o pilno be denpa bu .i doi luk. mi patfu do zo'o
(Come to the Dot Si= de! Luke, I am your father. :D )

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.
--0050450143dd5d819b0492388c8d--