From bpfk-list+bncCN673cmqFBC358flBBoEbAi75A@googlegroups.com Sun Oct 10 10:11:34 2010 Received: from mail-yw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.213.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P4zQp-0000hb-Ff; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:34 -0700 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7sf1255278ywo.16 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:received:x-vr-score :x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score:message-id:date:from:user-agent :x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HU1xxx3vp54aoFIGHiik/sJ/OZjKb/wEIbFb9S5/+OE=; b=YAiaiS5ub28YELNJBKkXcqhTc+iCHsr8nnsMHixBe6xKtuldVL5LkNbL/Uz5jUs5Yg ZpIDToCiAZWJWARVoG1/AQ90X/FcapQL3ZHZ3w3EUZD+rfrj4RsmoFkXt+BHFzP+jJiC QQd251kqCykOAgYr3tPYjCWheKduBwdBxxlKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:x-vr-score:x-authority-analysis:x-cm-score :message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h9REdCmNLbjQOiE8jVvRGIOKdccCm690fvsup9T2wiEanLxKlqAp/057F+XbQX34A6 9TPMmFFhkvG06D1eoSPuwd9UeKp50SnnFFUT9OiApLTpXBzlgE8jY4MXhM2K3/6D0uTg 0KbN4IoMuwWFkNE1k9cKIN4mSMSvs++KD5gyM= Received: by 10.150.73.20 with SMTP id v20mr470651yba.4.1286730679890; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.150.158.14 with SMTP id g14ls994256ybe.7.p; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.92.5 with SMTP id u5mr1248571ybl.59.1286730679604; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.92.5 with SMTP id u5mr1248570ybl.59.1286730679583; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id q39si2764492yba.5.2010.10.10.10.11.19; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 10:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 68.230.240.59 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) client-ip=68.230.240.59; Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101010171119.RKEW21335.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:11:19 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.179.118.163]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id H5BJ1f0073Xcbvq025BJK5; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:11:18 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=Of5FRk7D4fcJlrWbzxPvWNsT1UhKEYt7m7ky24PLP4c= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:17 a=GcmTXsxuxtl8Wq8c4eYA:9 a=pqpch9jr7TrQYJsnGGAp6ooKkSUA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=7ls7RdmwX4RvLZNVULbZcg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Message-ID: <4CB1F3EA.5000608@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:12:10 -0400 From: Robert LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] BPFK work References: <4CB0B239.50107@lojban.org> In-Reply-To: X-Original-Sender: lojbab@lojban.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 68.230.240.59 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of lojbab@lojban.org) smtp.mail=lojbab@lojban.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >> It was specifically conceived for >>situations where one knows that what one is saying cannot parse as a >>continuation of what has gone previously, but has been superfluous in Loj= ban >>parsers which were designed to inherently assume a single text. >=20 >=20 > Why would something that you put at the end of the text have that > effect? Are you saying that the intention was that B's answer to "do > klama ma" should be "lo zarci fa'o" so that "lo zarci" is not taken as > a continuation of "do klama ma"? That seems like an odd way to go > about it. Actually, it would have to be fa'o lo zarci to be sure to end any prior=20 text before starting the new one. But then for most practical purposes,=20 .i or ni'o are good enough. "Back in the day" (makes me feel elderly to=20 use that phrase), we thought that each exchange in formal Lojban=20 conversation would generally involve starting with .i or ni'o=20 (recognizing that informally it would usually be left out). lojbab --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.