From bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRDw5cjlBBoE4Kw_Aw@googlegroups.com Sun Oct 10 14:41:20 2010 Received: from mail-ww0-f61.google.com ([74.125.82.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P53dt-0007dc-98; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:20 -0700 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15sf664606wwe.16 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:mime-version:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=c72jvXpA0sOq6W4sClwzMS2EyfZygmorJHjwaPD4PYs=; b=D2AF/UeCTFe9CD5h87wokrovKaqsMNaEA+hj/b4f83Rer//T3WZouS/7yB98I5oLeb bPq+qMt0af0rtwxDvgkqGTFK71p2PWNMhap2MO33UKrr6QjDIPrDownyx6nS0qUzzlYo BX2C42SNohPpOJJ0rnjXN/6krlSvaqwmlqk18= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V5BfUC5pmqmXC7YKabvAvVfzQiJm49zoeADq7y5CU6iR5ry3qQKg0lhtCOqqqmgTiE loeWQZhyQsKFRxOJ7r0cxbgyuVR+JE1aIlr2YmeXCsxCGkYXxYg+wm2kAHUQuHPpA2dU DjzNWXxflUzxDJS9QnnPXGLW0TKu5NouqVLqA= Received: by 10.216.237.132 with SMTP id y4mr468133weq.16.1286746864445; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:04 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.227.131.162 with SMTP id x34ls823017wbs.0.p; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.136.195 with SMTP id s3mr220979wbt.25.1286746862884; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.136.195 with SMTP id s3mr220978wbt.25.1286746862846; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ww0-f52.google.com (mail-ww0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id k1si2005425wbc.4.2010.10.10.14.41.01; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.82.52; Received: by mail-ww0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 18so1573444wwi.33 for ; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:41:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.135.8 with SMTP id l8mr4842892wbt.224.1286746848130; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.145.130 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Oct 2010 14:40:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:40:48 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [bpfk] {.i} and {ni'o}, continuation or new jufra From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jjllambias@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote: > This thread is so completely unrelated to BPFK work that I feel we really > ought to move it to a new thread by now. It is related in as much as the BPFK's task is to define the language, and there seems to be a significant discrepancy in the way the language is being understood. > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Jonathan Jones wrote= : >> 2010/10/10 Jorge Llamb=EDas >>> >>> A: =A0(something that parses correctly on its own) >>> B: =A0(something that parses correctly on its own) >>> >>> My default assumption is that what A said is one text, and what B said >>> is another text. In some special cases, B may be adding something to >>> A's text, but normally they are just responding to A's text with their >>> own new text. >> >> If what B says is parsable, but would cause jbofi'e to say "selbri may b= e >> missing on line x column x", then I would probably assume that it is a >> continuation. But you do understand that that is contrary to the traditional understanding, right? See for example: http://dag.github.com/cll/19/5/ << 5.3) do klama ma You go-to [what sumti?] Where are you going? The answer is a simple sumti: 5.4) le zarci The store. >> mu'o mi'e xorxes --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googleg= roups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-l= ist?hl=3Den.