From bpfk-list+bncCK30vq5WEJbd5eYEGgQAa5P1@googlegroups.com Tue Nov 09 07:54:13 2010 Received: from mail-pz0-f61.google.com ([209.85.210.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PFqWP-0002D0-7U; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:54:12 -0800 Received: by pzk26 with SMTP id 26sf2085789pzk.16 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:54:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:x-beenthere:received:received:received :received:received-spf:received:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; bh=/wzinsgKX90WV6y7qy1ESLASvNdZknea4wLRm9s7k9A=; b=HByB4KAANJWMUNgJznYxdJavWTH0JHYYGw7ZciqjqZEJeh9+fCIloFGGvmoR6a92if iFIcnGg1crmcCwLkgkZVsNJ+x34c7iI4/N3AxoidHwLr2n2q6t6cyX5h1msgKpQqzOgc STIaOSQ713frcY9ZP2aS5MS/yeNcOhXaDqjN4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:in-reply-to:user-agent :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :sender:list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type :content-disposition; b=IhYX0VvTYRfmQzQG4aI/XjN1n1sgI8zb7uAnuOH/BRESMTgPJ6ttwtSh3dkRyEn+be CzdHbObGPj2RuAWFB5LccSNkeTk+bswMA7U/VJVBjwIFgIzgW9VVod1WeZUu03FPDyLF IKygRgk7yAAK8uN6fj4zvm4YlyWjk2jut1wQM= Received: by 10.142.150.28 with SMTP id x28mr405950wfd.7.1289318038132; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:58 -0800 (PST) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.142.78.15 with SMTP id a15ls10084246wfb.2.p; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.204.5 with SMTP id b5mr4325420wfg.12.1289318037001; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.204.5 with SMTP id b5mr4325419wfg.12.1289318036977; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org (digitalkingdom.org [173.13.139.234]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id p40si13632120wfc.6.2010.11.09.07.53.56; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.234; Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PFqWC-00023e-4s for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 07:53:56 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:53:56 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [bpfk] dag-cll, next steps Message-ID: <20101109155356.GT9301@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com References: <20101106031404.GX9301@digitalkingdom.org> <20101106033028.GB12188@mercury.ccil.org> <20101106202239.GZ9301@digitalkingdom.org> <20101107022316.GA3435@mercury.ccil.org> <20101107201109.GD9301@digitalkingdom.org> <20101108223546.GI9301@digitalkingdom.org> <20101109153222.GR9301@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Original-Sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 04:40:04PM +0100, Daniel Brockman wrote: > >> Do the examples even have individual URL:s? Hmm, I guess they > >> have URL:s with fragments. So that's going to take Javascript > >> to redirect. > > > > Umm, no? > > > > http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/rewrite/rewrite_guide.html#redirectanchors > > That's redirecting _to_ fragment URLs, not _from_. > > $ nc -l 4000 > (navigate to http://localhost:4000/#foo) > Output from nc: GET / HTTP/1.1 > > In other words, the browser isn't even sending "foo" to the server. Right you are. Lame. And I see why, now, too. *sigh* Dual anchors it is, then. > I don't appreciate the condescending tone when you don't know what > you're talking about. (I actually don't even appreciate > condescending tones when you *do* know what you're talking about.) Sorry, bad habit, working on it. Realized I shouldn't have done it, but after I hit send. -Robin -- http://singinst.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. Lojban (http://www.lojban.org/): The language in which "this parrot is dead" is "ti poi spitaki cu morsi", but "this sentence is false" is "na nei". My personal page: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/rlp/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.