Received: from mail-pw0-f61.google.com ([209.85.160.61]:36954)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <bpfk-list+bncCJ2UzZHuDRCDndP3BBoEOQ0AbA@googlegroups.com>)
	id 1ReAGt-00075d-SB; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:55:21 -0800
Received: by pbcc3 with SMTP id c3sf6887649pbc.16
        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:55:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlegroups.com; s=beta;
        h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:x-spam-score:x-spam_score
         :x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:sender:x-original-sender
         :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list
         :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive
         :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type;
        bh=59dPYeTmBnQTdaVvqnaZuTZF9FwbHrsVNFZQ5+KBSVo=;
        b=kPcfqYCYkU9LHwiLKy/xI/m6Bsil1dxxvNe4SqEDX1pegNzw2QYveZVs1RGtr4K/ec
         B0E1M6N9wVd6jg3hudKvlRR06IoZASPmF4c5s1Ikg83BZRWk/KGSrhaysd1gyLAyq/xb
         AdKUVTcriw1vbTMQ8X+/dNrSRORDxUmmRu2TE=
Received: by 10.68.201.199 with SMTP id kc7mr602009pbc.2.1324666499815;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:59 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.68.11.234 with SMTP id t10ls17128814pbb.3.gmail; Fri, 23 Dec
 2011 10:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.190.71 with SMTP id go7mr11335384pbc.8.1324666499602;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.190.71 with SMTP id go7mr11335382pbc.8.1324666499588;
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2si992715pbe.0.2011.12.23.10.54.59
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.13.139.236;
Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>)
	id 1ReAGg-00075M-Gb
	for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:58 -0800
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:57198)
	by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)
	id 1ReAGa-000759-PG
	for bpfk@lojban.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:58 -0800
Received: by lagr15 with SMTP id r15so4231659lag.40
        for <bpfk@lojban.org>; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.113.131 with SMTP id iy3mr12733019lab.39.1324666484803;
 Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.5.105 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:54:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111223175808.GH23459@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <20111223175808.GH23459@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:54:44 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2cEF-n3mZc4+eVCgOHfa5Bg=vsYdHZ9uBDgOWZnB3k5gw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bpfk] Can we drop the fore tanru cmavo?
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com, bpfk@lojban.org
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam_score: -0.1
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /
Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
X-Original-Sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com:
 domain of nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org designates 173.13.139.236 as
 permitted sender) smtp.mail=nobody@stodi.digitalkingdom.org; dkim=pass (test
 mode) header.i=@gmail.com
Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com
List-ID: <bpfk-list.googlegroups.com>
X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765
List-Post: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/post?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list@googlegroups.com>
List-Help: <http://groups.google.com/support/?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+help@googlegroups.com>
List-Archive: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en_US>
List-Subscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>, <mailto:bpfk-list+subscribe@googlegroups.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list/subscribe?hl=en_US>,
 <mailto:googlegroups-manage+972099695765+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam_score: 0.0
X-Spam_score_int: 0
X-Spam_bar: /

On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Robin Lee Powell
<rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
>
> i.e., can PEG support having one set of fore logical connectives
> only, or is the issue deeper than lookahead?

If the question is whether guheks can be replaced by geks, then the
answer is no, because tanru "gu'e broda gi brode" is different from
bridi "ge broda gi brode". Compare "(gu'e broda gi brode) ko'a" with
"ge (broda) gi (brode ko'a)".

If the question is whether guheks would be missed by anyone if they
were just dropped, then probably not. I don't think anyone ever uses
them.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list?hl=en.