Received: from mail-ye0-f185.google.com ([209.85.213.185]:41868) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V2Ozd-0002Se-3E; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:28 -0700 Received: by mail-ye0-f185.google.com with SMTP id l10sf232708yen.12 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=20120806; h=sender:x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-spam-score:x-spam_score :x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=poPsb5arH7njj6ocYahnNKWlH4WhmOzlsnmiMb/FPgE=; b=UgE/J9Gi7gyqr53zTR2JA09ktd9F5ZKX06Q0ng7r2uJVxb35QMvQycExUL3cel39h3 xOr927yp9Aq1SAyLaHq2/mVFyKiDusBGcd9NwRpfyPDqnnr3qo5rnoN/MzJVFqJPgsZX mnwGgwfcXUrYEGorkQ3g5hCl6UR6KdFJOxSFEDij73jFCOoPNxwI0Xz80cBfj4Kwkduq Ea0Iy52JwEkL2Vn0O1ei0GhXqXBZrbt5IwtHK6cws3kdWXsPkF/4JDHs17aK1pJqiPre z8fLG2B5NAi4VYOgzOmqF0llllHXn1TrTWpY1X/pL9KGGgnzY6+Em+/6kVMKQ+ETjHPs EufQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:x-spam-score:x-spam_score :x-spam_score_int:x-spam_bar:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-subscribe:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=poPsb5arH7njj6ocYahnNKWlH4WhmOzlsnmiMb/FPgE=; b=TXGOZrnu+D/74g4pG5ICYoftC1Rqezvc+U2KNRP1PLKfFDx+fcoG5ArmoacDNMocjf ecv2/eKpPeLldbLijOKASgp9xZyWb3ZyyjO/U0PfRUCP7MYM0R7jMLOv/TY8m3rvcPWv +9AuN191cbrhd6rLLDwiv+WwspYX7Z8EHg95vR9D4Q/j4Y/Er/nfKRfxH1BSynpdI897 ikkzLlHj35DPvlHo4AtkewlfkLHZOPGYKBOC42Y++PMgFIvvSxFGkx6hs7k9Exysik/F EDHBl1IlMxLlsXF/Be84/hyDn87dOncO0/2Ijsix+CywDW4U84TjRT8kmB1vmNwN9Dt0 Qwhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-beenthere:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:x-spam-score:x-spam_score:x-spam_score_int :x-spam_bar:x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results :reply-to:precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id :list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender:list-subscribe :list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=poPsb5arH7njj6ocYahnNKWlH4WhmOzlsnmiMb/FPgE=; b=oe1KB/Y2yiP93DxwJIhH9yqHIq7pC9SmwIzMssAz5FWhgxRYkMGA6ECyMtFkLQDhky LdLxFrtoeKuSv3I+dQuWNvVSiZu/qSLZ3m47A3XHWwZGjjxNAGxtJjv7iPv3rMkLoFCC BVc9RMVVfowNAx+/SrEBIZMyH/SdPA0fXGS+2k03/sb9b8nxDbaXdjfZ2lCONtYUgPhv TmKy84Asp0VfLk3AuRZdPYPpBXe60qss16FVd147NBWAfH9nVN8e84bzoNloL8hnkP24 8DX5/8vh2I9mRuoHyR7weduOsl8QrvyzbMqD+nWzSpZ/4auZLiCrruL3wRQljTpO7qf4 gzyg== X-Received: by 10.50.62.103 with SMTP id x7mr282692igr.16.1374771974828; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:14 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.50.1.77 with SMTP id 13ls3442800igk.17.canary; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.202.3 with SMTP id ke3mr9057601pbc.5.1374771974309; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stodi.digitalkingdom.org (mail.digitalkingdom.org. [173.13.139.236]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id al8si5833638pbd.0.2013.07.25.10.06.14 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com) client-ip=173.13.139.236; Received: from nobody by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V2OzV-0002Sa-MY for bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:13 -0700 Received: from mail-vc0-f183.google.com ([209.85.220.183]:41519) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V2OzR-0002SC-7b for bpfk@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:13 -0700 Received: by mail-vc0-f183.google.com with SMTP id m17so133599vca.20 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.49.58.242 with SMTP id u18mr1613752qeq.23.1374771962699; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:06:02 -0700 (PDT) From: la gleki To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Cc: bpfk@lojban.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20130709144152.GC4227@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> References: <20130709144152.GC4227@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> Subject: [bpfk] Re: mabla and zabna by fiat. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 0 X-Spam_bar: / X-Original-Sender: gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 173.13.139.236 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com) smtp.mail=gleki.is.my.name@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list bpfk-list@googlegroups.com; contact bpfk-list+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 972099695765 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: bpfk-list@googlegroups.com List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2907_29400471.1374771962361" X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.1 X-Spam_score_int: 1 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: are the new definitions approved? why not adding them to the official list now? (together with the revised definition of {gleki}). On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:41:52 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote: > > > Does anyone mind if I simply declare xorxes' definitions correct for > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mabla and > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zabna ? It's what everyone uses > anyways, and I'm sick of this shit. > > -Robin > > -- > http://intelligence.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e > lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e > lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni > li'u > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [209.85.213.185 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (gleki.is.my.name[at]gmail.com) 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is CUSTOM_MED -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid ------=_Part_2907_29400471.1374771962361 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 are the new definitions approved? why not adding them to the official list now? (together with the revised definition of {gleki}). On Tuesday, July 9, 2013 6:41:52 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote: > > > Does anyone mind if I simply declare xorxes' definitions correct for > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mabla and > http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zabna ? It's what everyone uses > anyways, and I'm sick of this shit. > > -Robin > > -- > http://intelligence.org/ : Our last, best hope for a fantastic future. > .i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e > lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e > lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakni > li'u > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BPFK" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ------=_Part_2907_29400471.1374771962361 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable are the new definitions approved?
why not adding them to the official l= ist now? (together with the revised definition of {gleki}).

On Tuesd= ay, July 9, 2013 6:41:52 PM UTC+4, Robin Powell wrote:

Does anyone mind if I simply declare xorxes' definitions correct for
ht= tp://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/mabla and
ht= tp://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/zabna ?  It's what everyone us= es
anyways, and I'm sick of this shit.

-Robin

--=20
http://intellige= nce.org/ :  Our last, best hope for a fantastic future.
.i ko na cpedu lo nu stidi vau loi jbopre .i danfu lu na go'i li'u .e
lu go'i li'u .i ji'a go'i lu na'e go'i li'u .e lu go'i na'i li'u .e
lu no'e go'i li'u .e lu to'e go'i li'u .e lu lo mamta be do cu sofybakn= i li'u

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &= quot;BPFK" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to bpfk-list+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to bpfk-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at ht= tp://groups.google.com/group/bpfk-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
 
 
------=_Part_2907_29400471.1374771962361--