Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 04:22:00 -0700
Message-Id: <201110151122.p9FBM0km027841@jukni.digitalkingdom.org>
To: m3o@plasmatix.com
From: webmaster@lojban.org
Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word li'oi -- By jvsLoC
X-Spam_score: 1.0
X-Spam_score_int: 10
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user jvsLoC has edited a definition of "li'oi"
    in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < marks word as being optional,
    i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention
    --- > marks word as being optional, i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical
    AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention would the marked construct be
   left out [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS
  0.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP      To: misformatted and dynamic rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user jvsLoC has edited a
definition of "li'oi" in the language "English".

Differences:

2,2c2,2
< 		marks word as being optional, i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention
---
> 		marks word as being optional, i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention would the marked construct be left out


Old Data:

	Definition:
		marks word as being optional, i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention

	Notes:
		coi fu'e li'oi la fu'o selpa'i would semantically expand to coi la selpa'i and coi selpa'i meaning that both a person named selpa'i and a beloved one is being greeted (both being the same person).

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		marks word as being optional, i.e. the bridi would still be both grammatical AND reflect the speakers opinion/intention would the marked construct be left out

	Notes:
		coi fu'e li'oi la fu'o selpa'i would semantically expand to coi la selpa'i and coi selpa'i meaning that both a person named selpa'i and a beloved one is being greeted (both being the same person).

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/li'oi> to see it.