Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:25:10 -0800
Message-Id: <201203050425.q254P9qX009421@jukni.digitalkingdom.org>
To: eyeonus@gmail.com, sarefo@gmail.com, jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org
From: webmaster@lojban.org
Content-type: text/plain;charset=UTF-8
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word tubyspe -- By eyeonus
X-Spam_score: 2.6
X-Spam_score_int: 26
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user eyeonus has edited a definition of
   "tubyspe" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < The bond $t_3$-
    $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is,
    or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true. --- > $t_3$:
    $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is,
    or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
                             [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
  0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS
  0.6 TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP      To: misformatted and dynamic rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user eyeonus has edited a
definition of "tubyspe" in the language "English".

Differences:

5,5c5,5
< 		The bond $t_3$- $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true.
---
> 		$t_3$: $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true.


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$t_1$ is the sibling-in-law of $t_2$

	Notes:
		The bond $t_3$- $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: sibling-in-law, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:
		Word: sibling-in-law, In Sense: , For Place: 1


New Data:

	Definition:
		$t_1$ is the sibling-in-law of $t_2$

	Notes:
		$t_3$: $t_1$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_1$, $s_1$ is married to $s_2$, $t_2$ is, or is a sibling of, $s_2$, $t_1=s_1$ and $t_2=s_2$ is not true.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: sibling-in-law, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:
		Word: sibling-in-law, In Sense: , For Place: 1


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/tubyspe> to see it.