Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:41082 helo=digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Trv7L-0002tf-B0; Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:38:48 -0800 Received: by digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 6 Jan 2013 10:38:43 -0800 From: "Apache" Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2013 10:38:43 -0800 To: webmaster@lojban.org, nictytan@gmail.com Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word ce'oi -- By djeikyb Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <50e9c4b3.qXHsNbxdIFKrIxDb%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.0 X-Spam_score_int: 20 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user djeikyb has edited a definition of "ce'oi" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < More useful than termsets. --- > "ce'oi" is the word of choice to separate the arguments in bridi3. Using {ce'o} there has obvious limitations when the selbri actually calls for a sequence. Obviously, ce'oi has issues too if the selbri can accept an argument list, but this can be circumvented more readily with {ke}...{ke'e} brackets than it can with {ce'o}. Consider ".i lo ka broda cu selbri fi ko'a ce'o ko'e". Without inspecting the type requirements of broda and the respective types of ko'a and ko'e, one cannot determine the meaning of the bridi. Furthermore, if one accepts non-static typing of sumti places, multiple correct answers can be given for a question asking what is the bridi1. This would create ambiguity that is otherwise resolved by {ce'oi}. [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user djeikyb has edited a definition of "ce'oi" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < More useful than termsets. --- > "ce'oi" is the word of choice to separate the arguments in bridi3. Using {ce'o} there has obvious limitations when the selbri actually calls for a sequence. Obviously, ce'oi has issues too if the selbri can accept an argument list, but this can be circumvented more readily with {ke}...{ke'e} brackets than it can with {ce'o}. Consider ".i lo ka broda cu selbri fi ko'a ce'o ko'e". Without inspecting the type requirements of broda and the respective types of ko'a and ko'e, one cannot determine the meaning of the bridi. Furthermore, if one accepts non-static typing of sumti places, multiple correct answers can be given for a question asking what is the bridi1. This would create ambiguity that is otherwise resolved by {ce'oi}. Old Data: Definition: argument list separator: acts as a comma between arguments in an argument list supplied to a function. Notes: More useful than termsets. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: argument list separator, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: argument list separator: acts as a comma between arguments in an argument list supplied to a function. Notes: "ce'oi" is the word of choice to separate the arguments in bridi3. Using {ce'o} there has obvious limitations when the selbri actually calls for a sequence. Obviously, ce'oi has issues too if the selbri can accept an argument list, but this can be circumvented more readily with {ke}...{ke'e} brackets than it can with {ce'o}. Consider ".i lo ka broda cu selbri fi ko'a ce'o ko'e". Without inspecting the type requirements of broda and the respective types of ko'a and ko'e, one cannot determine the meaning of the bridi. Furthermore, if one accepts non-static typing of sumti places, multiple correct answers can be given for a question asking what is the bridi1. This would create ambiguity that is otherwise resolved by {ce'oi}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: argument list separator, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.