From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 15:32:42 -0800
To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word nonsmipi'i -- By krtisfranks
Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org
Message-ID: <5313bf9a.qOCllLSZC6e6a4kn%webmaster@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam_score: 2.0
X-Spam_score_int: 20
X-Spam_bar: ++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition
    of "nonsmipi'i" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < x1 and
   x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this structure x3
   (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure ("addition" merely
    being (one of) its commutative group operation)); this partnership is so
   defined. Unlike many textbook definitions, this definition still allows 0
   to itself be a zero-divisor (with any element) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}
    --- > x1 and x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this
    structure x3 (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure
   ("addition" merely being (one of) its commutative group operation(s))); the
    aforementioned partnership is so defined. Unlike many textbook definitions,
    this definition still allows such 0 to itself be a zero-divisor ((so partnered)
    with any element in the set underlying x3) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (2.0 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
                             [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
  0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED  RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL
                             was blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "nonsmipi'i" in the language "English".

Differences:

5,5c5,5
< 		x1 and x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this structure x3 (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure ("addition" merely being (one of) its commutative group operation)); this partnership is so defined. Unlike many textbook definitions, this definition still allows 0 to itself be a zero-divisor (with any element) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}
---
> 		x1 and x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this structure x3 (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure ("addition" merely being (one of) its commutative group operation(s))); the aforementioned partnership is so defined. Unlike many textbook definitions, this definition still allows such 0 to itself be a zero-divisor ((so partnered) with any element in the set underlying x3) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x1$ is a zero-divisor partnered with element(s) $x2$ in structure/ring $x3$

	Notes:
		x1 and x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this structure x3 (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure ("addition" merely being (one of) its commutative group operation)); this partnership is so defined. Unlike many textbook definitions, this definition still allows 0 to itself be a zero-divisor (with any element) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: zero-divisor, In Sense: ring element x such that there exists a ring element y such thar xy=0 in the ring, for a given fixed ring and the underlying set thereof (pedantically)

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x1$ is a zero-divisor partnered with element(s) $x2$ in structure/ring $x3$

	Notes:
		x1 and x2 are elements of the set underlying x3 and x1*x2=0 in this structure x3 (where "0" denotes the 'additive' identity of the structure ("addition" merely being (one of) its commutative group operation(s))); the aforementioned partnership is so defined. Unlike many textbook definitions, this definition still allows such 0 to itself be a zero-divisor ((so partnered) with any element in the set underlying x3) in x3. See also: {narnonsmikemnonsmipi'i}

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: zero-divisor, In Sense: ring element x such that there exists a ring element y such thar xy=0 in the ring, for a given fixed ring and the underlying set thereof (pedantically)

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/nonsmipi'i> to see it.