Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:48442 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1WQVGn-0002fn-CK; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:12:03 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:11:56 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 22:11:56 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Added At Word ti'ormanku -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <532a789c.349zN1+PDVgwjKZB%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.0 X-Spam_score_int: 20 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "ti'ormanku" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x1$=$m1$ is shade-darkened/has shadow $x2$=$c1$ cast upon it by obfuscating/blocking/(at least semi-)opaque object $x3$=$c2$ from energy/light/transmission source $x4$=$c3$; $x2$ is the shadow-eclipse caste upon $x1$ by $x3$, blocking radiation from $x4$ [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "ti'ormanku" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x1$=$m1$ is shade-darkened/has shadow $x2$=$c1$ cast upon it by obfuscating/blocking/(at least semi-)opaque object $x3$=$c2$ from energy/light/transmission source $x4$=$c3$; $x2$ is the shadow-eclipse caste upon $x1$ by $x3$, blocking radiation from $x4$ Notes: Possible uses include (but are not limited to) lunar-style eclipses in which the eclipsed object (as seen from another object) is not physically blocked from sight by yet another object but is shaded from sight by the shadow cast upon it by some object (possibly the one from which the eclipse is viewed). There is no real physical difference between this and a solar-style eclipse (both rely on linear alignment of bodies), but the chosen vantage point varies among them and thus causes different interpretations of the same phenomenon of alignment. In other words, it is an eclipse in which the eclipsed object is viewed to be darkened by a shadow (caste upon it by some object) with no significant blocking/impeding body physically betwixt the eclipsed object and the object from which viewing of the eclipse occurs. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: shade-darkened, In Sense: to be dark due to shadow/being in the shade Word: shadow eclipse, In Sense: lunar-style; eclipse in which the eclipsed object is viewed to be darkened by a shadow with no significant blocking body physically betwixt the eclipsed object and the object from which viewing occurs Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.