Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:55599 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Wqq0w-0006eR-Lo; Sat, 31 May 2014 13:36:31 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 31 May 2014 13:36:26 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Sat, 31 May 2014 13:36:26 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word mivyvelvicyvauro'i -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <538a3d4a.oJuTGOhgUo186g3n%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.0 X-Spam_score_int: 20 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "mivyvelvicyvauro'i" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivyvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. --- > Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivborvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. 11a12,12 \n> Word: fossil rock, In Sense: 14,14d14 < Word: fossil rock, In Sense: \n [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "mivyvelvicyvauro'i" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivyvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. --- > Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivborvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. 11a12,12 \n> Word: fossil rock, In Sense: 14,14d14 < Word: fossil rock, In Sense: \n Old Data: Definition: $x_1$=$r_1$=$vau_1$ is a rock cobtaining trace/remnant/fossil $x_2$=$vic_4$=$vau_2$ of biological entity/organism $x_2$=$j_1$=$vic_3$, with rock composition $x_4$=$r_2$ and from location $x_5$=$r_3$; $x_2$ is the fossilized trace of organism $x_3$ preserved in rock $x1$ Notes: Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivyvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: fossil, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Word: fossilized remnant, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Word: fossilized trace, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Word: fossil rock, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$=$r_1$=$vau_1$ is a rock cobtaining trace/remnant/fossil $x_2$=$vic_4$=$vau_2$ of biological entity/organism $x_2$=$j_1$=$vic_3$, with rock composition $x_4$=$r_2$ and from location $x_5$=$r_3$; $x_2$ is the fossilized trace of organism $x_3$ preserved in rock $x1$ Notes: Fossil x2 need not be a body (part), just a trace of an organism (scat, trail/footprint, etc.). Containment need not be total. The fossil container is necessarily a fossil rock (see {mivyvelvicyvau} for generalization to any container). The remnant can be "fresh", so long as it is found in rock. See also: {rokybixmivborvelvi'u} for not "fresh"/petrified/fossilized remains. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: fossil, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Word: fossil rock, In Sense: Word: fossilized remnant, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Word: fossilized trace, In Sense: must be found in rock; need not be petrified/fossilized Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.