Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:39054 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Ws4sY-00070f-69; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:40:59 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:40:53 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 23:40:53 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word cmeta -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <538ebf75.ncQgFw7XaduhdO2h%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "cmeta" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {sucta}. --- > Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. 11,11d10 < Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative \n12a12,12 \n> Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -0.5 BAYES_05 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 1 to 5% [score: 0.0186] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "cmeta" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {sucta}. --- > Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. 11,11d10 < Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative \n12a12,12 \n> Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept, being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense) Notes: Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {sucta}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative Word: fractally applicative, In Sense: Word: meta abstraction, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative; (pictorally, beyond, beside, or higher up) Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept, being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense) Notes: Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: fractally applicative, In Sense: Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative Word: meta abstraction, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative; (pictorally, beyond, beside, or higher up) Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.