Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:40315 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Ws5Gw-0007Hd-1l; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:06:11 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:06:05 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:06:05 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word cmeta -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <538ec55d.ngL0sdTNKwBK6EU9%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "cmeta" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept, being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense) --- > $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept/notion/system/topic/etc., being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense); $x_1$ is an/a piece of/an example of $x_2$ that applies fractally thereto 5,5c5,5 < Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. --- > Does not (necessarily) mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. x1 does not necessarily abstract [from] [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0065] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "cmeta" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept, being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense) --- > $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept/notion/system/topic/etc., being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense); $x_1$ is an/a piece of/an example of $x_2$ that applies fractally thereto 5,5c5,5 < Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. --- > Does not (necessarily) mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. x1 does not necessarily abstract [from] (in one sense), but is abstract to, x2. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept, being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense) Notes: Does not mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: fractally applicative, In Sense: Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative Word: meta abstraction, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative; (pictorally, beyond, beside, or higher up) Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is meta to/an example of $x_2$ that describes such an object/concept/notion/system/topic/etc., being meta in property/aspect $x_3$, and which has features $x_4$, governed by/considered in system/considerations/epistemology/theory $x_5$; $x_1$ is meta (a particular type of abstraction of $x_2$ so as to apply to itself in some sense); $x_1$ is an/a piece of/an example of $x_2$ that applies fractally thereto Notes: Does not (necessarily) mean "beyond", "after", "beside"; in some (rather pictoral) senses, these meanings may be necessary but not sufficient for being meta in this sense; thus, "metaphysics" should not be translated using this word. x1 is an object, notion, topic, system, etc. which applies to x2 but which is itself an example thereof; for example, the meanings of the words "metalinguistics" and "metadata" are meta in this sense. It is not necessarily directly self-referential, but could be fractally applicative. x1 is an X that is about (another) X; x1 is an abstraction of X so as to apply to X. x1 does not necessarily abstract [from] (in one sense), but is abstract to, x2. See also: {xulta} (generalized/weaker), {sucta}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: fractally applicative, In Sense: Word: meta, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative Word: meta abstraction, In Sense: X about X; fractally applicative; (pictorally, beyond, beside, or higher up) Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.