Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:41207 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1Ws5cC-0007R3-FF; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:28:09 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:28:04 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 00:28:04 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word xlarafsrejvo -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <538eca84.xImmJzXmVAZ6029p%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.4 X-Spam_score_int: 24 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "xlarafsrejvo" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). --- > Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). See also: {srejvo}. 10a11,11 \n> Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: 13,13d13 < Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: \n [...] Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to DNSWL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [173.13.139.235 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0548] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "xlarafsrejvo" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). --- > Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). See also: {srejvo}. 10a11,11 \n> Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: 13,13d13 < Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: \n Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is an improperly-created/wrongly-proposed/illy-proposed lujvo with intended meaning $x_2$ but actual interpretation/built from metaphor $x_3$, due to/with error $x_4$ in its rafsi $x_5$, which is unacceptable to $x_6$ by standard $x_7$, in language $x_8$ Notes: Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: error lujvo, In Sense: Word: improper lujvo, In Sense: Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is an improperly-created/wrongly-proposed/illy-proposed lujvo with intended meaning $x_2$ but actual interpretation/built from metaphor $x_3$, due to/with error $x_4$ in its rafsi $x_5$, which is unacceptable to $x_6$ by standard $x_7$, in language $x_8$ Notes: Notice that terbri structure and conditions of error are not referenced in the terbri of this word. The error could be simply failing to be the highest-scoring lujvo available (for a given tanru) by some algorithm/standard; however, it could also be the product of a certain unintentionally wrong tanru construct (wherein a given meaning was intended but is not reflected in the {veljvo}). See also: {srejvo}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: bad rafsi, In Sense: Word: error lujvo, In Sense: Word: improper lujvo, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.