From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 11:06:36 -0700
To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word pepsi -- By krtisfranks
Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org
Message-ID: <538f602c.HjCM3BPcEHhfSA0O%webmaster@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam_score: -0.9
X-Spam_score_int: -8
X-Spam_bar: /


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "pepsi" in the language "English".

Differences:

5,5c5,5
< =09=09u'ivla: Character alignment on soda scale.  This is not a simpl=
e matter of taste preference or of one product being more or less than =
the other product in some aspect (subjective or otherwise); this is an =
overall judgment of not only product quality and appearance, but is als=
o a moral judgment of the product, the company, and (in contrast) of th=
e opposing side (including the product, company, and fans thereof); in =
other words, it is an integral character alignment/trait (integrity) of=
 the judge. Pepsi and Coca-Cola are taken to be directly opposing force=
s and archenemies/diametrically opposite alignments (by defaults, speci=
fication of of one determines the other uniquely). If x1 is better than=
 x4 in overall goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 1 and the j=
udge is a fan of x1 (and probably of x3); if x1 is equal to x4 in overa=
ll goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 0 (and the judge is pro=
bably weird); if x1 is worse than x4 in overall goodness according to t=
he judge, then x2 =3D -1 and the judge is a fan of x4 (and probably of =
x5); this evaluation essentially determines the "morally" favored compa=
ny of the judge. The defaults work "backward" from what is given: speci=
fication of any of the products or companies in the first 5 terbri (exc=
luding the jugment x2, at some level) uniquely determines the other ter=
bri by default; PepsiCo is is associated by default with product Pepsi,=
 the Coca-Cola company is associated by default with product Coke/Coca-=
Cola; by default, alignment x2 being n toward Pepsi/Coca-Cola (resp.) y=
ields alignment -n toward Coca-Cola/Pepsi (resp.). The biggest blunder =
(x9) of the Coca-Cola Company is probably/arguably New Coke.  See also:=
 {besto}, {sodva}.
---
> =09=09u'ivla: Character alignment on soda scale.  This is not a simpl=
e matter of taste preference or of one product being more or less than =
the other product in some aspect (subjective or otherwise); this is an =
overall judgment of not only product quality and appearance, but is als=
o a moral judgment of the product, the company, and (in contrast) of th=
e opposing side (including the product, company, and fans thereof); in =
other words, it is an integral character alignment/trait (integrity) of=
 the judge. Pepsi and Coca-Cola are taken to be directly opposing force=
s and archenemies/diametrically opposite alignments (by defaults, speci=
fication of of one determines the other uniquely). If x1 is better than=
 x4 in overall goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 1 and the j=
udge is a fan of x1 (and probably of x3); if x1 is equal to x4 in overa=
ll goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 0 (and the judge is pro=
bably weird); if x1 is worse than x4 in overall goodness according to t=
he judge, then x2 =3D -1 and the judge is a fan of x4 (and probably of =
x5); this evaluation essentially determines the "morally" favored compa=
ny of the judge. The defaults work "backward" from what is given: speci=
fication of any of the products or companies in the first 5 terbri (exc=
luding the jugment x2, at some level) uniquely determines the other ter=
bri by default; PepsiCo is is associated by default with product Pepsi,=
 the Coca-Cola company is associated by default with product Coke/Coca-=
Cola; by default, alignment x2 being n toward Pepsi/Coca-Cola (resp.) y=
ields alignment -n toward Coca-Cola/Pepsi (resp.). The biggest blunder =
(x9) of the Coca-Cola Company is probably/arguably New Coke. This word =
is notable for its numerous defaults (differentiating it from certain o=
ther u'ivla in nature/structure). See also: {besto}, {sodva}.


Old Data:

=09Definition:
=09=09$x_1$ (default: Pepsi) is a soda product that is better/equal/wor=
se $x_2$ (li, number; resp.: 1, 0, -1; no default), and is produced/man=
ufactured by $x_3$ (default: whichever company makes sense [for absolut=
ely default case: PepsiCo]), with aforementioned evaluation compared to=
/against soda product $x_4$ (default: the analog/similar but competing/=
archrival soda; [for absolute default: Coke/Coca-Cola]) of producer/man=
ufactuer (enemy) $x_5$ (default: whichever other (opposing) company mak=
es sense [for absolutely default case: the Coca-Cola Company]) accordin=
g to the taste preference of, moral judgment of, and overall goodness (=
quality) evaluation by (judge/evaluator) $x_6$ (probable contextless de=
fault: speaker/utterer), who is ranked as a fan of the formermost/latte=
rmost [depending on evaluation given by $x_2$; see notes] product or co=
mpany with die-hard rating $x_7$ (li, number; subjective) on scale $x_8=
$ (si'o), despite (or because of) hating bad-decision product/admitting=
 short-sighted failure (of favored [see note] company) $x_9$ (default: =
the publicly-declared worst one/the most decried error); where evaluato=
r [$x_6$] generally ignores third-party soda product $x_{10}$, which is=
 produced/manufactured by (company) $x_{11}$, even though said evaluato=
r judges the said third-party product and/or producer to have overall g=
oodness/quality (taste preference, product design appeal/evaluation, mo=
ral judgment, etc.) $x_{12}$ [need not be a number in this case] accord=
ing to scheme $x_{13}$ (si'o); where the first judgment [$x_2$] is acco=
rding to scheme/justification $x_{14}$, which really should not need ex=
plaining anyway, you nincompoop. $x_6$ has soda character alignment $x_=
2$ toward product $x_1$ and company $x_3$ that produces it.

=09Notes:
=09=09u'ivla: Character alignment on soda scale.  This is not a simple =
matter of taste preference or of one product being more or less than th=
e other product in some aspect (subjective or otherwise); this is an ov=
erall judgment of not only product quality and appearance, but is also =
a moral judgment of the product, the company, and (in contrast) of the =
opposing side (including the product, company, and fans thereof); in ot=
her words, it is an integral character alignment/trait (integrity) of t=
he judge. Pepsi and Coca-Cola are taken to be directly opposing forces =
and archenemies/diametrically opposite alignments (by defaults, specifi=
cation of of one determines the other uniquely). If x1 is better than x=
4 in overall goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 1 and the jud=
ge is a fan of x1 (and probably of x3); if x1 is equal to x4 in overall=
 goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 0 (and the judge is proba=
bly weird); if x1 is worse than x4 in overall goodness according to the=
 judge, then x2 =3D -1 and the judge is a fan of x4 (and probably of x5=
); this evaluation essentially determines the "morally" favored company=
 of the judge. The defaults work "backward" from what is given: specifi=
cation of any of the products or companies in the first 5 terbri (exclu=
ding the jugment x2, at some level) uniquely determines the other terbr=
i by default; PepsiCo is is associated by default with product Pepsi, t=
he Coca-Cola company is associated by default with product Coke/Coca-Co=
la; by default, alignment x2 being n toward Pepsi/Coca-Cola (resp.) yie=
lds alignment -n toward Coca-Cola/Pepsi (resp.). The biggest blunder (x=
9) of the Coca-Cola Company is probably/arguably New Coke.  See also: {=
besto}, {sodva}.

=09Jargon:
=09=09

=09Gloss Keywords:
=09=09Word: Coca-Cola, In Sense: morality alignment
=09=09Word: Pepsi, In Sense: morality alignment
=09=09Word: Soda War morality alignment, In Sense:=20
=09=09Word: alignment (soda), In Sense: soda preference
=09=09Word: character alignment (soda), In Sense: soda preference

=09Place Keywords:


New Data:

=09Definition:
=09=09$x_1$ (default: Pepsi) is a soda product that is better/equal/wor=
se $x_2$ (li, number; resp.: 1, 0, -1; no default), and is produced/man=
ufactured by $x_3$ (default: whichever company makes sense [for absolut=
ely default case: PepsiCo]), with aforementioned evaluation compared to=
/against soda product $x_4$ (default: the analog/similar but competing/=
archrival soda; [for absolute default: Coke/Coca-Cola]) of producer/man=
ufactuer (enemy) $x_5$ (default: whichever other (opposing) company mak=
es sense [for absolutely default case: the Coca-Cola Company]) accordin=
g to the taste preference of, moral judgment of, and overall goodness (=
quality) evaluation by (judge/evaluator) $x_6$ (probable contextless de=
fault: speaker/utterer), who is ranked as a fan of the formermost/latte=
rmost [depending on evaluation given by $x_2$; see notes] product or co=
mpany with die-hard rating $x_7$ (li, number; subjective) on scale $x_8=
$ (si'o), despite (or because of) hating bad-decision product/admitting=
 short-sighted failure (of favored [see note] company) $x_9$ (default: =
the publicly-declared worst one/the most decried error); where evaluato=
r [$x_6$] generally ignores third-party soda product $x_{10}$, which is=
 produced/manufactured by (company) $x_{11}$, even though said evaluato=
r judges the said third-party product and/or producer to have overall g=
oodness/quality (taste preference, product design appeal/evaluation, mo=
ral judgment, etc.) $x_{12}$ [need not be a number in this case] accord=
ing to scheme $x_{13}$ (si'o); where the first judgment [$x_2$] is acco=
rding to scheme/justification $x_{14}$, which really should not need ex=
plaining anyway, you nincompoop. $x_6$ has soda character alignment $x_=
2$ toward product $x_1$ and company $x_3$ that produces it.

=09Notes:
=09=09u'ivla: Character alignment on soda scale.  This is not a simple =
matter of taste preference or of one product being more or less than th=
e other product in some aspect (subjective or otherwise); this is an ov=
erall judgment of not only product quality and appearance, but is also =
a moral judgment of the product, the company, and (in contrast) of the =
opposing side (including the product, company, and fans thereof); in ot=
her words, it is an integral character alignment/trait (integrity) of t=
he judge. Pepsi and Coca-Cola are taken to be directly opposing forces =
and archenemies/diametrically opposite alignments (by defaults, specifi=
cation of of one determines the other uniquely). If x1 is better than x=
4 in overall goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 1 and the jud=
ge is a fan of x1 (and probably of x3); if x1 is equal to x4 in overall=
 goodness according to the judge, then x2 =3D 0 (and the judge is proba=
bly weird); if x1 is worse than x4 in overall goodness according to the=
 judge, then x2 =3D -1 and the judge is a fan of x4 (and probably of x5=
); this evaluation essentially determines the "morally" favored company=
 of the judge. The defaults work "backward" from what is given: specifi=
cation of any of the products or companies in the first 5 terbri (exclu=
ding the jugment x2, at some level) uniquely determines the other terbr=
i by default; PepsiCo is is associated by default with product Pepsi, t=
he Coca-Cola company is associated by default with product Coke/Coca-Co=
la; by default, alignment x2 being n toward Pepsi/Coca-Cola (resp.) yie=
lds alignment -n toward Coca-Cola/Pepsi (resp.). The biggest blunder (x=
9) of the Coca-Cola Company is probably/arguably New Coke. This word is=
 notable for its numerous defaults (differentiating it from certain oth=
er u'ivla in nature/structure). See also: {besto}, {sodva}.

=09Jargon:
=09=09

=09Gloss Keywords:
=09=09Word: Coca-Cola, In Sense: morality alignment
=09=09Word: Pepsi, In Sense: morality alignment
=09=09Word: Soda War morality alignment, In Sense:=20
=09=09Word: alignment (soda), In Sense: soda preference
=09=09Word: character alignment (soda), In Sense: soda preference

=09Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/pepsi> to see it.