From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:39:16 -0700
To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word dinso -- By krtisfranks
Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org
Message-ID: <53a90f04.3/eZhND0ajk9sy7k%webmaster@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam_score: 1.8
X-Spam_score_int: 18
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition
    of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a dinosaur
    of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. --- > $x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general:
    any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.
    5,5c5,5 < gismu version of {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly
    only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them
    (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs,
    plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even
   synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such,
    it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or
   respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Proposed
    short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau} --- > A gismu version of
    {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members
    of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds);
    its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs,
    dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words,
    any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word
    that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic
    classification of these animals. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa},
    {ketslau} [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.8 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                             [score: 0.4915]
  1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "dinso" in the language "English".

Differences:

2,2c2,2
< 		$x_1$ is a dinosaur of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.
---
> 		$x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.
5,5c5,5
< 		gismu version of {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}
---
> 		A gismu version of {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a dinosaur of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.

	Notes:
		gismu version of {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$.

	Notes:
		A gismu version of {dinsauru}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/dinso> to see it.