Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:43269 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1Z89Mv-0002UE-JE; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:47:18 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:47:13 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 08:47:13 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, stefan.ginsberg@gmail.com Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word benre -- By spheniscine Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <558c2281.GCwcEMeEknm74QmY%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user spheniscine has edited a definition of "benre" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$; $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ --- > $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$ // $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0002] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user spheniscine has edited a definition of "benre" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$; $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ --- > $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$ // $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$; $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ Notes: A "beneficiary" here is someone or something for which something is done, and this relation may be either beneficial or disadvantageous. Consider "I poisoned the cake for him" vs "I baked a cake for him" ("for him to eat" would be a purpose). See also {be'ei}, {kosmu}, {terzu'e}, {selxau} Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: beneficiary, In Sense: recipient of an event/action Place Keywords: Word: is done for, In Sense: something done for someone, For Place: 2 New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the "beneficiary"/intended-recipient of $x_2$ (event/action), as intended by $x_3$ // $x_2$ is done for $x_1$ Notes: A "beneficiary" here is someone or something for which something is done, and this relation may be either beneficial or disadvantageous. Consider "I poisoned the cake for him" vs "I baked a cake for him" ("for him to eat" would be a purpose). See also {be'ei}, {kosmu}, {terzu'e}, {selxau} Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: beneficiary, In Sense: recipient of an event/action Place Keywords: Word: is done for, In Sense: something done for someone, For Place: 2 You can go to to see it.