Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:39686 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZEp2e-0003fh-0n; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:29:56 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:29:51 -0700 From: "Apache" Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:29:51 -0700 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word dinso -- By spheniscine Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <55a4660f.asa7RTr37L/BfWtz%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user spheniscine has edited a definition of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesio}. --- > A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user spheniscine has edited a definition of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesio}. --- > A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesio}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {reksa}. The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, birds); its referent might include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {reksa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.