Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:37073 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aCyPh-0006Y2-V0; Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:38:22 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:38:17 -0800 From: "Apache" Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:38:17 -0800 To: webmaster@lojban.org, curtis289@att.net Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word sei'au -- By krtisfranks Bcc: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org Message-ID: <567f24e9.D2da8jJ56uJSe5bu%webmaster@lojban.org> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "sei'au" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Terminated by itself ({sei'au}); the sumti after it must be explicit (even if elliptical, such as with {zo'e}); explicit termination is always required. Inside module formed by the sei'au brackets, at most three sumti (contracting connected sumti into one) can be specified. The first one is a {mau'au}-{zai'ai} quoted function (which is taken to be operand of this word); it must be preceded (not necessarily immediately, but before its termination) by {li}; let f be this function. The second and third sumti each are a nonnegative integer (preceded by {li}); call them $n$ and $m$ respectively; $n$ defaults to 1 and $m$ defaults to the next thus-far unfilled terbri number for/of the current selbri (unless these specifications are overridden by zmico); if every terbri is filled in the current level of nesting, this word extracts itself to the next level of nesting (removing one layer); if it is in the outermost layer of nesting, then this default value of $m$ causes it to have no effect. The $m$th terbri of the selbri to which this construct applies will be passed through f before being filled by any sumti (including {zo'e}, explicit or implicit) for the next $n$ occurrences of the aforementioned selbri in the discourse (with $n$ = 1 counting the current occurrence; aside: a non-default value of $m$ can thus affect the interpretation of an already-filled terbri of the currently open selbri in an afterthought manner); this counting is only done forward in the discourse/time, including the current selbri, never back through it. Thus, $n$ = 0 effectively neutralizes this word, $n$ being infinite causes the effect to be permanent. f being {zi'a'o} returns the terbri in question to its default value/understanding (according to zmico). It is important to realize that this word does not affect the $m$th terbri of all selbri, just of the one currently open when this word is utterred (no matter where it is positioned/nested in future costructs). If this word is in conflict with another usage of this word over the [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0001] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "sei'au" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < =09=09Terminated by itself ({sei'au}); the sumti after it must be exp= licit (even if elliptical, such as with {zo'e}); explicit termination i= s always required. Inside module formed by the sei'au brackets, at most= three sumti (contracting connected sumti into one) can be specified. T= he first one is a {mau'au}-{zai'ai} quoted function (which is taken to = be operand of this word); it must be preceded (not necessarily immediat= ely, but before its termination) by {li}; let f be this function. The s= econd and third sumti each are a nonnegative integer (preceded by {li})= ; call them $n$ and $m$ respectively; $n$ defaults to 1 and $m$ default= s to the next thus-far unfilled terbri number for/of the current selbri= (unless these specifications are overridden by zmico); if every terbri= is filled in the current level of nesting, this word extracts itself t= o the next level of nesting (removing one layer); if it is in the outer= most layer of nesting, then this default value of $m$ causes it to have= no effect. The $m$th terbri of the selbri to which this construct appl= ies will be passed through f before being filled by any sumti (includin= g {zo'e}, explicit or implicit) for the next $n$ occurrences of the afo= rementioned selbri in the discourse (with $n$ =3D 1 counting the curren= t occurrence; aside: a non-default value of $m$ can thus affect the int= erpretation of an already-filled terbri of the currently open selbri in= an afterthought manner); this counting is only done forward in the dis= course/time, including the current selbri, never back through it. Thus,= $n$ =3D 0 effectively neutralizes this word, $n$ being infinite causes= the effect to be permanent. f being {zi'a'o} returns the terbri in que= stion to its default value/understanding (according to zmico). It is im= portant to realize that this word does not affect the $m$th terbri of a= ll selbri, just of the one currently open when this word is utterred (n= o matter where it is positioned/nested in future costructs). If this wo= rd is in conflict with another usage of this word over the same terbri,= follow the specification applied by the most recent still active occur= rence of this construct; this construct is considered to be active for = this purpose until its-$n$ occurrences of the appropriate terbri are ut= tered; thus if the earlier-$n$ is greater than the later-$n$, the later= effect takes precedent until it is disactivated, after which point the= earlier effect resumes. Define $n$ and $m$ (and f) outside of the mod= ule created by brackets of this word if you wish to reuse them; for the= sake of future referencing the value specified within the module, $n$ = gets reduced/decremented by 1 at each occurrence of the appropriate ter= bri until it reaches the value 0 (at which value it remains forever aft= er); if $n$ is a series of connected numbers, this decrementation is ap= plied to each connectand in turn. Use {pi'u} (possibly subscripted) in = order to simplify utterances. Especially helpful if f is non-injective.= Let 'broda' be the currentry open selbri; then this word replaces $bro= da_m$ with f($broda_m$) in the definition of 'broda' for the next $n$ o= ccurrences of the terbri. For example, if f were {cu'a}, then any sumti= which fills $broda_m$ will be understood to be doing so in absolute va= lue. See also: {de'ai}. --- > =09=09Terminated by itself ({sei'au}); explicit termination is always= required; the sumti after it must be explicit (even if elliptical, suc= h as with explicit use of {zo'e}). Inside the module formed by the "sei= 'au" brackets, at most three sumti (where this counting contracts conne= cted sumti into one) can be specified. The first one is a {mau'au}-{zai= 'ai} quoted function (which is taken to be the operand of this word); i= t must be preceded (not necessarily immediately) by {li}; let f be this= function. The second and third sumti each are a nonnegative integer (p= receded by {li}); call them $n$ and $m$ respectively; $n$ defaults to 1= and $m$ defaults to the next (thus-far unfilled) terbri number for/of = the current selbri unless these specifications are overridden by zmico;= if the relevant selbri has no terbri following this word, then this de= fault value of $m$ causes this word to have no effect. The $m$th terbri= of the selbri to which this construct applies will be passed through f= before being filled by any sumti (including {zo'e}, explicit or implic= it; terbri numbers start counting at 1 and increase by 1 with each new = occurrence) for the next $n$ occurrences of the aforementioned selbri i= n the discourse (with $n$ =3D 1 counting the current occurrence; aside:= a non-default value of $m$ can thus affect the interpretation of an al= ready-filled terbri of the currently open selbri in an afterthought man= ner); this counting is only done forward in the discourse/time, includi= ng the current selbri, never back through it. Thus, $n$ =3D 0 effective= ly neutralizes this word, $n$ being infinite causes the effect to be pe= rmanent. f being {zi'a'o} returns the terbri in question to its default= value/understanding (according to zmico). It is important to realize t= hat this word does not affect the $m$th terbri of all selbri, just of t= he one currently open when this word is utterred (no matter where it is= positioned/nested in future costructs). If this word is in conflict wi= th another usage of this word over the same terbri, follow the specific= ation applied by the most recent still active occurrence of this constr= uct; this construct is considered to be active for this purpose until i= ts-$n$ occurrences of the appropriate terbri are uttered; thus if the e= arlier-$n$ is greater than the later-$n$, the later effect takes preced= ent until it is disactivated, after which point the earlier effect resu= mes. Define $n$ and $m$ (and f) outside of the module created by brack= ets of this word if you wish to reuse them; for the sake of future refe= rencing the value specified within the module, $n$ gets reduced/decreme= nted by 1 at each occurrence of the appropriate terbri until it reaches= the value 0 (at which value it remains forever after); if $n$ is a ser= ies of connected numbers, this decrementation is applied to each connec= tand in turn. Use {pi'u} (possibly subscripted) in order to simplify ut= terances. Especially helpful if f is non-injective. The affected terbri= must be referenced by {ce'u} as an operand of f wheresoever it is desi= red; this reference must be explicit. Let 'broda' be the currentry ope= n selbri; then this word replaces $broda_m$ with f($broda_m$) in the de= finition of 'broda' for the next $n$ occurrences of the terbri. For exa= mple, if f were {cu'a}, then any sumti which fills $broda_m$ will be un= derstood to be doing so in absolute value. See also: {de'ai}. Old Data: =09Definition: =09=09terbri editor: passes the terbri value through the quoted functio= n so that the sumti that fills it really is filling the output of the f= unction =09Notes: =09=09Terminated by itself ({sei'au}); the sumti after it must be expli= cit (even if elliptical, such as with {zo'e}); explicit termination is = always required. Inside module formed by the sei'au brackets, at most t= hree sumti (contracting connected sumti into one) can be specified. The= first one is a {mau'au}-{zai'ai} quoted function (which is taken to be= operand of this word); it must be preceded (not necessarily immediatel= y, but before its termination) by {li}; let f be this function. The sec= ond and third sumti each are a nonnegative integer (preceded by {li}); = call them $n$ and $m$ respectively; $n$ defaults to 1 and $m$ defaults = to the next thus-far unfilled terbri number for/of the current selbri (= unless these specifications are overridden by zmico); if every terbri i= s filled in the current level of nesting, this word extracts itself to = the next level of nesting (removing one layer); if it is in the outermo= st layer of nesting, then this default value of $m$ causes it to have n= o effect. The $m$th terbri of the selbri to which this construct applie= s will be passed through f before being filled by any sumti (including = {zo'e}, explicit or implicit) for the next $n$ occurrences of the afore= mentioned selbri in the discourse (with $n$ =3D 1 counting the current = occurrence; aside: a non-default value of $m$ can thus affect the inter= pretation of an already-filled terbri of the currently open selbri in a= n afterthought manner); this counting is only done forward in the disco= urse/time, including the current selbri, never back through it. Thus, $= n$ =3D 0 effectively neutralizes this word, $n$ being infinite causes t= he effect to be permanent. f being {zi'a'o} returns the terbri in quest= ion to its default value/understanding (according to zmico). It is impo= rtant to realize that this word does not affect the $m$th terbri of all= selbri, just of the one currently open when this word is utterred (no = matter where it is positioned/nested in future costructs). If this word= is in conflict with another usage of this word over the same terbri, f= ollow the specification applied by the most recent still active occurre= nce of this construct; this construct is considered to be active for th= is purpose until its-$n$ occurrences of the appropriate terbri are utte= red; thus if the earlier-$n$ is greater than the later-$n$, the later e= ffect takes precedent until it is disactivated, after which point the e= arlier effect resumes. Define $n$ and $m$ (and f) outside of the modul= e created by brackets of this word if you wish to reuse them; for the s= ake of future referencing the value specified within the module, $n$ ge= ts reduced/decremented by 1 at each occurrence of the appropriate terbr= i until it reaches the value 0 (at which value it remains forever after= ); if $n$ is a series of connected numbers, this decrementation is appl= ied to each connectand in turn. Use {pi'u} (possibly subscripted) in or= der to simplify utterances. Especially helpful if f is non-injective. L= et 'broda' be the currentry open selbri; then this word replaces $broda= _m$ with f($broda_m$) in the definition of 'broda' for the next $n$ occ= urrences of the terbri. For example, if f were {cu'a}, then any sumti w= hich fills $broda_m$ will be understood to be doing so in absolute valu= e. See also: {de'ai}. =09Jargon: =09=09 =09Gloss Keywords: =09=09Word: terbri-level function application, In Sense: temporarily re= defines what a value of a terbri means =09Place Keywords: New Data: =09Definition: =09=09terbri editor: passes the terbri value through the quoted functio= n so that the sumti that fills it really is filling the output of the f= unction =09Notes: =09=09Terminated by itself ({sei'au}); explicit termination is always r= equired; the sumti after it must be explicit (even if elliptical, such = as with explicit use of {zo'e}). Inside the module formed by the "sei'a= u" brackets, at most three sumti (where this counting contracts connect= ed sumti into one) can be specified. The first one is a {mau'au}-{zai'a= i} quoted function (which is taken to be the operand of this word); it = must be preceded (not necessarily immediately) by {li}; let f be this f= unction. The second and third sumti each are a nonnegative integer (pre= ceded by {li}); call them $n$ and $m$ respectively; $n$ defaults to 1 a= nd $m$ defaults to the next (thus-far unfilled) terbri number for/of th= e current selbri unless these specifications are overridden by zmico; i= f the relevant selbri has no terbri following this word, then this defa= ult value of $m$ causes this word to have no effect. The $m$th terbri o= f the selbri to which this construct applies will be passed through f b= efore being filled by any sumti (including {zo'e}, explicit or implicit= ; terbri numbers start counting at 1 and increase by 1 with each new oc= currence) for the next $n$ occurrences of the aforementioned selbri in = the discourse (with $n$ =3D 1 counting the current occurrence; aside: a= non-default value of $m$ can thus affect the interpretation of an alre= ady-filled terbri of the currently open selbri in an afterthought manne= r); this counting is only done forward in the discourse/time, including= the current selbri, never back through it. Thus, $n$ =3D 0 effectively= neutralizes this word, $n$ being infinite causes the effect to be perm= anent. f being {zi'a'o} returns the terbri in question to its default v= alue/understanding (according to zmico). It is important to realize tha= t this word does not affect the $m$th terbri of all selbri, just of the= one currently open when this word is utterred (no matter where it is p= ositioned/nested in future costructs). If this word is in conflict with= another usage of this word over the same terbri, follow the specificat= ion applied by the most recent still active occurrence of this construc= t; this construct is considered to be active for this purpose until its= -$n$ occurrences of the appropriate terbri are uttered; thus if the ear= lier-$n$ is greater than the later-$n$, the later effect takes preceden= t until it is disactivated, after which point the earlier effect resume= s. Define $n$ and $m$ (and f) outside of the module created by bracket= s of this word if you wish to reuse them; for the sake of future refere= ncing the value specified within the module, $n$ gets reduced/decrement= ed by 1 at each occurrence of the appropriate terbri until it reaches t= he value 0 (at which value it remains forever after); if $n$ is a serie= s of connected numbers, this decrementation is applied to each connecta= nd in turn. Use {pi'u} (possibly subscripted) in order to simplify utte= rances. Especially helpful if f is non-injective. The affected terbri m= ust be referenced by {ce'u} as an operand of f wheresoever it is desire= d; this reference must be explicit. Let 'broda' be the currentry open = selbri; then this word replaces $broda_m$ with f($broda_m$) in the defi= nition of 'broda' for the next $n$ occurrences of the terbri. For examp= le, if f were {cu'a}, then any sumti which fills $broda_m$ will be unde= rstood to be doing so in absolute value. See also: {de'ai}. =09Jargon: =09=09 =09Gloss Keywords: =09=09Word: terbri-level function application, In Sense: temporarily re= defines what a value of a terbri means =09Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.