Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:34360 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aidcz-0003fz-V5 for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:54:58 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:54:53 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Added At Word polfemu -- By krtisfranks Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:54:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "polfemu" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is something which is (relatively, but immensely) strong in domain/in doing $x_2$ but which is (relatively but extremely) restricted (thus weakened and vulnerable) in domain/doing $x_3$ [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0010] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "polfemu" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is something which is (relatively, but immensely) strong in domain/in doing $x_2$ but which is (relatively but extremely) restricted (thus weakened and vulnerable) in domain/doing $x_3$ Notes: The restriction should not just imply some degree of vulnerability; it should also imply an inability to effectively achieve goals. The Italian navy during the Second World War can be so described. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: strong but restricted thus weak and vulnerable, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.