Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:36398 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1aie7B-0005Vh-Tz for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:26:10 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:26:05 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word faukne -- By krtisfranks Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 01:26:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "faukne" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points z in the domain set) $x_2 (x_1)(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). --- > The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points $z$ in the domain set) $(x_2 (x_1))(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0014] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "faukne" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points z in the domain set) $x_2 (x_1)(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). --- > The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points $z$ in the domain set) $(x_2 (x_1))(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a mathematical object for/to which operator $x_2$ is defined/may be applied when under conditions $x_3$ under definition (of operator)/standard/type $x_4$ Notes: The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points z in the domain set) $x_2 (x_1)(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: -able, In Sense: math operation may be applied Word: mathematical operator is defined, In Sense: Word: operatable, In Sense: math Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a mathematical object for/to which operator $x_2$ is defined/may be applied when under conditions $x_3$ under definition (of operator)/standard/type $x_4$ Notes: The result is unimportant. Mathematical objects cannot really do anything nor can they experience anything, and they are not altered, so "{kakne}" does not really work. $x_2$ may be a "{mau'au}"-"{zai'ai}"-quoted operator (possibly with some of its terbri filled). $x_3$ determines when (example: for which points $z$ in the domain set) $(x_2 (x_1))(z)$ makes sense/is defined. $x_4$ can be a macro which really is a name of a type of such operator ($x_2$ represents the class, $x_4$ denotes the specific realization), the name being associated with all of the conditions/rules/descriptions necessary. "Differintegrable (according to some definition or type of differintegral operator named $x_4$)": ~"faukne be lo {salri} co'e" (where $x_3$ will be the set upon which $x_1$ is differintegrable and $x_4$ can be words like "partial", "directional", "vectorial", "total", "Riemann", "Lebesgue", vel sim.). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: -able, In Sense: math operation may be applied Word: mathematical operator is defined, In Sense: Word: operatable, In Sense: math Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.