Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:54868 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bVXNl-00064n-A1 for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:09:22 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 22:09:17 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word plikai -- By krtisfranks Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 22:09:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 2.4 (++) X-Spam_score: 2.4 X-Spam_score_int: 24 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "plikai" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1 = k_1 ~ p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2 ~ p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ --- > $x_1 = k_1$ ~ $p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2$ ~ $p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ [...] Content analysis details: (2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% [score: 0.0700] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "plikai" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1 = k_1 ~ p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2 ~ p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ --- > $x_1 = k_1$ ~ $p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2$ ~ $p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ Old Data: Definition: $x_1 = k_1 ~ p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2 ~ p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ Notes: Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: functionality, In Sense: feature for/in use Word: utility, In Sense: feature for/in use Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1 = k_1$ ~ $p_2$ has functionality/utility/use features $x_2 = k_2$ ~ $p_2$ for purpose/in context $x_3 = p_3$ Notes: Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: functionality, In Sense: feature for/in use Word: utility, In Sense: feature for/in use Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.