Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:56317 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bcF8k-0004HH-Sq for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:05:36 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:05:30 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word vidvi -- By krtisfranks Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:05:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "vidvi" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ --- > $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to/of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "vidvi" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ --- > $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to/of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ Notes: Differs from {tivni} in that a given broadcast may have multiple sensory components, but this one deals only with the visual ones; $x_2$ may also not be televized/broadcasted (it could even be a static painting). It differs from {viska} in that no observer is necessary; a recording inherently has or does not have visual content. See also: {snavi}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: video content, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is the video/(possibly changing) visual content to/of recording/broadcast $x_2$ displayed/produced by medium/device $x_3$ Notes: Differs from {tivni} in that a given broadcast may have multiple sensory components, but this one deals only with the visual ones; $x_2$ may also not be televized/broadcasted (it could even be a static painting). It differs from {viska} in that no observer is necessary; a recording inherently has or does not have visual content. See also: {snavi}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: video content, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.