From: "Apache" <apache@digitalkingdom.org>
To: curtis289@att.net
Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org
Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word skifa -- By krtisfranks
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 02:09:20 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <E1blY6C-0007GS-9b@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam_score: 0.5
X-Spam_score_int: 5
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org",
 has NOT identified this incoming email as spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition
    of "skifa" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < Strict 'IF';
    the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives
    no indication about the truth of $x_2$ (in general). This word is like {kanxe}.
    See also: {sigda}. --- > Strict-'IF'; the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth
    of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives no indication about the truth of $x_2$
    (in general). This word is like {kanxe}. See also: {sigda}. 10a11,12 \n>
   Word: strict-IF statement, In Sense: > Word: IF-but-not-ONLY-IF statement,
    In Sense: [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.5 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
                             See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: lojban.org]
  1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT   RBL: No description available.
                             [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC           Delivered to internal network by host with
                             dynamic-looking rDNS


In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a
definition of "skifa" in the language "English".

Differences:

5,5c5,5
< 		Strict 'IF'; the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives no indication about the truth of $x_2$ (in general). This word is like {kanxe}. See also: {sigda}.
---
> 		Strict-'IF'; the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives no indication about the truth of $x_2$ (in general). This word is like {kanxe}. See also: {sigda}.
10a11,12
\n> 		Word: strict-IF statement, In Sense: 
> 		Word: IF-but-not-ONLY-IF statement, In Sense: 


Old Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a logical statement which says that $x_2$ (du'u) being true logically implies (material implication) $x_3$ being necessarily true, but in which the converse does not hold (it is certain that there are cases in which 'IFF' fails: $x_2$ is not necessary for $x_3$).

	Notes:
		Strict 'IF'; the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives no indication about the truth of $x_2$ (in general). This word is like {kanxe}. See also: {sigda}.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:

	Place Keywords:


New Data:

	Definition:
		$x_1$ is a logical statement which says that $x_2$ (du'u) being true logically implies (material implication) $x_3$ being necessarily true, but in which the converse does not hold (it is certain that there are cases in which 'IFF' fails: $x_2$ is not necessary for $x_3$).

	Notes:
		Strict-'IF'; the truth of $x_2$ guarantees the truth of $x_3$ but the truth of $x_3$ gives no indication about the truth of $x_2$ (in general). This word is like {kanxe}. See also: {sigda}.

	Jargon:
		

	Gloss Keywords:
		Word: strict-IF statement, In Sense: 
		Word: IF-but-not-ONLY-IF statement, In Sense: 

	Place Keywords:


You can go to <http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/dict/skifa> to see it.