Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:37074 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1casMn-0007xR-QD for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:06:42 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 06 Feb 2017 15:06:37 -0800 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Added At Word gicmu -- By krtisfranks Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 15:06:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "gicmu" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_{1}$ is a (Lojban) root word expressing relation $x_{2}$ among argument roles $x_{3}$, with affix(es) $x_{4}$. [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "gicmu" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_{1}$ is a (Lojban) root word expressing relation $x_{2}$ among argument roles $x_{3}$, with affix(es) $x_{4}$. Notes: This word is meant to have exactly the same meaning, notes, restrictions, etc. as {gismu}; the two words are intended to be identicalnin every way except for four- and five-letter rafsi. The cmarafsi for this word are "-gim-" and "-gi'u-". Etymologically, this word should have been chosen rather than {gismu} but there was an error in the input; but due to gimkamsmikezypro, these two forms are identical in meaning; the preferred version of all members of the "{gismu}" quotient group (presently "{gismu}" itself) determines the potential or actualized rafsi associated with that group; in this case (between "{gicmu}" and "{gismu}"), only the longer rafsi are affected (no cmarafsi of "{gismu}" use the "s"). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: root word, In Sense: Word: gismu, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.