Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:45414 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cl1eb-0008VE-DM for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:03:02 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:02:57 -0800 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word zmaduje -- By krtisfranks Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:02:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "zmaduje" in the language "English". Differences: Old Data: [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: lojban.org] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "zmaduje" in the language "English". Differences: Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is more than/greater than/exceeds $x_2$ in property $x_3$ and the $x_4$th (li; 1 or 2) argument of this selbri actually has/is/attains property $x_3$ according to $x_5$. Notes: {zmadu} implies that one things is more than another in some property, but not that either actually achieves/has that property. For example, a two-year-old is older than a one-year-old but neither is old by normal human standards. This word says that not only is one thing more than another in some property, but at least one of them does have that property. So, an octagenarian is older than a toddler, and the former (but not the latter) actually is old by normal human standards. In my cases, if $x_4 = 2$, then not only does $x_2$ have property $x_3$, but $x_1$ also has property $x_3$ (just by a greater amount/to a greater extent); it is uncommon and indicative of a pathology in definition for $x_4 = 2$ to not imply that $x_4 = 1$ is also true. The converse is untrue: $x_1$ may have property $x_3$ even while $x_2$ does not ('$x_4 = 1$' is true but '$x_4 = 2$' is false, as in the octagenerian versus toddler example); however, in order to exclude the possibility that $x_4 = 2$ when $x_4 = 1$ is specified, one must explicitly specify that it is so - $x_4$ necessarily tells which argument does satisfy the proposition of having property $x_3$, it does not necessarily give any information as to which argument does not. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: more than and realized in having/being, In Sense: Word: more and actually is, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is more than/greater than/exceeds $x_2$ in property $x_3$ and the $x_4$th (li; 1 or 2) argument of this selbri actually has/is/attains property $x_3$ according to $x_5$. Notes: {zmadu} implies that one things is more than another in some property, but not that either actually achieves/has that property. For example, a two-year-old is older than a one-year-old but neither is old by normal human standards. This word says that not only is one thing more than another in some property, but at least one of them does have that property. So, an octagenarian is older than a toddler, and the former (but not the latter) actually is old by normal human standards. In my cases, if $x_4 = 2$, then not only does $x_2$ have property $x_3$, but $x_1$ also has property $x_3$ (just by a greater amount/to a greater extent); it is uncommon and indicative of a pathology in definition for $x_4 = 2$ to not imply that $x_4 = 1$ is also true. The converse is untrue: $x_1$ may have property $x_3$ even while $x_2$ does not ('$x_4 = 1$' is true but '$x_4 = 2$' is false, as in the octagenerian versus toddler example); however, in order to exclude the possibility that $x_4 = 2$ when $x_4 = 1$ is specified, one must explicitly specify that it is so - $x_4$ necessarily tells which argument does satisfy the proposition of having property $x_3$, it does not necessarily give any information as to which argument does not. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: more than and realized in having/being, In Sense: Word: more and actually is, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.