Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:43152 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1d1gHd-0002fb-Ik for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:40:10 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:40:05 -0700 From: "Apache" To: lynn@foldr.moe Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word fegygau -- By lalxu Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:40:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user lalxu has edited a definition of "fegygau" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property). --- > $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property); $x_1$ angers / provokes / stirs up $x_2$. 5,5c5,5 < --- > Unlike the usual sense of "to anger", the person causing x2 to be angry (i.e., x1) isn't necessarily the target of the resulting anger (x3). [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0026] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user lalxu has edited a definition of "fegygau" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property). --- > $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property); $x_1$ angers / provokes / stirs up $x_2$. 5,5c5,5 < --- > Unlike the usual sense of "to anger", the person causing x2 to be angry (i.e., x1) isn't necessarily the target of the resulting anger (x3). Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property). Notes: Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ makes $x_2$ angry / mad at $x_3$ for $x_4$ (action / state / property); $x_1$ angers / provokes / stirs up $x_2$. Notes: Unlike the usual sense of "to anger", the person causing x2 to be angry (i.e., x1) isn't necessarily the target of the resulting anger (x3). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.