Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:55800 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1dCnDJ-00039L-II for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Mon, 22 May 2017 06:17:35 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 22 May 2017 06:17:33 -0700 From: "Apache" To: jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org, rheiss@sprynet.com Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word selvai -- By lalxu Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 06:17:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user lalxu has edited a definition of "selvai" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_2=v_1$ (object/event) is important/significant to $x_1=v_2$ (person/event) in aspect/for reason $x_3=v_3$ (nu/ka). --- > $x_1$ cares about $x_2$ for reason $x_3$ (nu/ka). 10a11,11 \n> Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance 13,13d13 < Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance \n [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user lalxu has edited a definition of "selvai" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_2=v_1$ (object/event) is important/significant to $x_1=v_2$ (person/event) in aspect/for reason $x_3=v_3$ (nu/ka). --- > $x_1$ cares about $x_2$ for reason $x_3$ (nu/ka). 10a11,11 \n> Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance 13,13d13 < Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance \n Old Data: Definition: $x_2=v_1$ (object/event) is important/significant to $x_1=v_2$ (person/event) in aspect/for reason $x_3=v_3$ (nu/ka). Notes: {se} {vajni} Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: judge, In Sense: of significance Word: significance judge, In Sense: Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance Place Keywords: Word: significance judge, In Sense: , For Place: 1 Word: significant, In Sense: , For Place: 2 Word: significance, In Sense: , For Place: 3 New Data: Definition: $x_1$ cares about $x_2$ for reason $x_3$ (nu/ka). Notes: {se} {vajni} Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: evaluator, In Sense: of significance Word: judge, In Sense: of significance Word: significance judge, In Sense: Place Keywords: Word: significance judge, In Sense: , For Place: 1 Word: significant, In Sense: , For Place: 2 Word: significance, In Sense: , For Place: 3 You can go to to see it.