Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:48050 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dwFik-0002p6-Kk for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:49:57 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:49:54 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word urbe -- By krtisfranks Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 15:49:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "urbe" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, exurban region $x_5$. --- > $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, and exurban region $x_5$. 5,5c5,5 < The divisions are fuzzy and none of the specifications are inherently legal/government-recognized. Generally, $x_2$ is primarily oriented toward work/daily activity and does not have or much support actually inhabiting there (except penthouses), it is the downtown of a relatively big city; $x_3$ begins to support habitation by the general public but is still urban/developed within an urban model (it may include boroughs); $x_4$ is almost exclusively habitable areas with local or smaller business (sometimes, there will be fractalic hubs with their own fairly well-developed commerical/business centers, but these will tend to be smaller and - as stated - more focused on commercial or smaller business interests (or a commercial chains or malls), rather than economic or industrial pursuits; they will also have a notably smaller servicing or permanent population and population density; but it is all fuzzy and there will be plenty of exceptions); $x_5$ is the outer region of a metropolitan area and it will be somewhat more sparsely populated and will grade toward a rural lifestyle or simply human-uninhabited/natural territory toward its outer edges, even though such features/lifestyle will not be ubiquitous. Megalopolises are bigger than $x_1$, typically (but not necessarily); $x_1$ contains (in a general way) or 'owns' or is the orientation of all of the other $x_i$s. See also: {tcadu}, [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "urbe" in the language "English". Differences: 2,2c2,2 < $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, exurban region $x_5$. --- > $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, and exurban region $x_5$. 5,5c5,5 < The divisions are fuzzy and none of the specifications are inherently legal/government-recognized. Generally, $x_2$ is primarily oriented toward work/daily activity and does not have or much support actually inhabiting there (except penthouses), it is the downtown of a relatively big city; $x_3$ begins to support habitation by the general public but is still urban/developed within an urban model (it may include boroughs); $x_4$ is almost exclusively habitable areas with local or smaller business (sometimes, there will be fractalic hubs with their own fairly well-developed commerical/business centers, but these will tend to be smaller and - as stated - more focused on commercial or smaller business interests (or a commercial chains or malls), rather than economic or industrial pursuits; they will also have a notably smaller servicing or permanent population and population density; but it is all fuzzy and there will be plenty of exceptions); $x_5$ is the outer region of a metropolitan area and it will be somewhat more sparsely populated and will grade toward a rural lifestyle or simply human-uninhabited/natural territory toward its outer edges, even though such features/lifestyle will not be ubiquitous. Megalopolises are bigger than $x_1$, typically (but not necessarily); $x_1$ contains (in a general way) or 'owns' or is the orientation of all of the other $x_i$s. See also: {tcadu}, {jarbu} (which this word generalizes). --- > The divisions are fuzzy and none of the specifications are inherently legal/government-recognized. Generally, $x_2$ is primarily oriented toward work/daily activity and does not have any or much support for actually inhabiting such a place/region (except penthouses), it is the downtown of a relatively big city; $x_3$ begins to support habitation by the general public but is still urban/developed within an urban model (it may include boroughs); $x_4$ is almost exclusively habitable areas with local or smaller business (sometimes, there will be fractalic hubs with their own fairly well-developed commercial/business centers, but these will tend to be smaller and - as stated - more focused on commercial or smaller business interests (or a commercial chains or malls), rather than economic or industrial pursuits; they will also have a notably smaller servicing or permanent population and population density; but it is all fuzzy and there will be plenty of exceptions); $x_5$ is the outer region of a metropolitan area and it will be somewhat more sparsely populated and will grade toward a rural lifestyle or simply human-uninhabited/natural territory toward its outer edges, even though such features/lifestyle will not be ubiquitous. Megalopolises are bigger than $x_1$, typically (but not necessarily); $x_1$ contains (in a general way) or 'owns' or is the orientation of all of the other $x_i$s; it the $x_2$ area/system. Outposts/frontier settlements do not belong to this structure. See also: {tcadu}, {jarbu} (which this word generalizes). Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, exurban region $x_5$. Notes: The divisions are fuzzy and none of the specifications are inherently legal/government-recognized. Generally, $x_2$ is primarily oriented toward work/daily activity and does not have or much support actually inhabiting there (except penthouses), it is the downtown of a relatively big city; $x_3$ begins to support habitation by the general public but is still urban/developed within an urban model (it may include boroughs); $x_4$ is almost exclusively habitable areas with local or smaller business (sometimes, there will be fractalic hubs with their own fairly well-developed commerical/business centers, but these will tend to be smaller and - as stated - more focused on commercial or smaller business interests (or a commercial chains or malls), rather than economic or industrial pursuits; they will also have a notably smaller servicing or permanent population and population density; but it is all fuzzy and there will be plenty of exceptions); $x_5$ is the outer region of a metropolitan area and it will be somewhat more sparsely populated and will grade toward a rural lifestyle or simply human-uninhabited/natural territory toward its outer edges, even though such features/lifestyle will not be ubiquitous. Megalopolises are bigger than $x_1$, typically (but not necessarily); $x_1$ contains (in a general way) or 'owns' or is the orientation of all of the other $x_i$s. See also: {tcadu}, {jarbu} (which this word generalizes). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: borough, In Sense: Word: city, In Sense: including all associated boroughs, suburbs, exurbs, etc. Word: city geographical structure, In Sense: Word: exurb, In Sense: Word: ex-urb, In Sense: Word: ex-urban, In Sense: Word: metropolis, In Sense: Word: metropolitan area, In Sense: Word: suburb, In Sense: Word: suburban, In Sense: Word: urban, In Sense: Word: urban area, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a general metropolitan area with (population, commercial, industrial, business, economic, infrastructural, vel sim.) center/focal point/downtown/main or dominating urban area $x_2$, with supporting semi-urban/inner suburban region $x_3$, more (outer) suburban region $x_4$, and exurban region $x_5$. Notes: The divisions are fuzzy and none of the specifications are inherently legal/government-recognized. Generally, $x_2$ is primarily oriented toward work/daily activity and does not have any or much support for actually inhabiting such a place/region (except penthouses), it is the downtown of a relatively big city; $x_3$ begins to support habitation by the general public but is still urban/developed within an urban model (it may include boroughs); $x_4$ is almost exclusively habitable areas with local or smaller business (sometimes, there will be fractalic hubs with their own fairly well-developed commercial/business centers, but these will tend to be smaller and - as stated - more focused on commercial or smaller business interests (or a commercial chains or malls), rather than economic or industrial pursuits; they will also have a notably smaller servicing or permanent population and population density; but it is all fuzzy and there will be plenty of exceptions); $x_5$ is the outer region of a metropolitan area and it will be somewhat more sparsely populated and will grade toward a rural lifestyle or simply human-uninhabited/natural territory toward its outer edges, even though such features/lifestyle will not be ubiquitous. Megalopolises are bigger than $x_1$, typically (but not necessarily); $x_1$ contains (in a general way) or 'owns' or is the orientation of all of the other $x_i$s; it the $x_2$ area/system. Outposts/frontier settlements do not belong to this structure. See also: {tcadu}, {jarbu} (which this word generalizes). Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: borough, In Sense: Word: city, In Sense: including all associated boroughs, suburbs, exurbs, etc. Word: city geographical structure, In Sense: Word: exurb, In Sense: Word: ex-urb, In Sense: Word: ex-urban, In Sense: Word: metropolis, In Sense: Word: metropolitan area, In Sense: Word: suburb, In Sense: Word: suburban, In Sense: Word: urban, In Sense: Word: urban area, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.