Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:39408 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e6AlX-00081j-UY for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 00:33:49 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 00:33:47 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Added At Word enklesi -- By krtisfranks Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 00:33:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "enklesi" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is an (arbitrary) $x_2$-set (li) of superset $x_3$; $x_1$ is subset/subgroup/subcategory/subclass/vel sim. of $x_3$ with cardinality/size $x_2$. [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has added a definition of "enklesi" in the language "English". New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is an (arbitrary) $x_2$-set (li) of superset $x_3$; $x_1$ is subset/subgroup/subcategory/subclass/vel sim. of $x_3$ with cardinality/size $x_2$. Notes: $x_2$ is a nonnegative cardinal. The two distinguishing features of $x_1$ are its size ($x_2$) and the object/structure ($x_3$) to which it belongs/which contains it. Any $x_2$ elements of $x_3$ can belong to $x_1$ as long as the total count is correct; no particular collection is necessarily included. It is bad form for $x_2$ to exceed the size/cardinality of $x_3$ and, necessarily, no such object/structure can exist. See also: {klesi}, {cletu}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: n-set, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.