Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:42966 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e6GiH-0006a0-3B for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:54:51 -0700 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:54:49 -0700 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word dinso -- By kritixilithos Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 06:54:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user kritixilithos has edited a definition of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. --- > A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user kritixilithos has edited a definition of "dinso" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. --- > A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. Old Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even synapsids (in other words, any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any ancient animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: $x_1$ is a dinosaur [very general: any ancient quasi-reptilian vertebrate or, possibly but probably not, modern bird] of type $x_2$ living in era $x_3$. Notes: A gismu version of {dinsauru}; contrast with {rexsa} (in particular, this word probably would not but could refer to modern birds whereas {rexsa} can without any connotation to the contrary; meanwhile, {rexsa} cannot refer to pterodons vel sim. but this word can). The use of this word is not strictly only relevant to members of clade Dinosauria, although it does include them (and, specifically, modern birds, although it connotes ancientness and extinction unless it is part of am explicitly contrary context); its referent might also/alternatively include pterosaurs, icthyosaurs, plesiosaurs, mosasaurs, dimetrodons, avemetatarsaliads, and perhaps even other synapsids (in other words, any prehistoric quasi-reptilian vertebrate). As such, it is a qualitative word that bears no particular or strong attention or respect to genealogy or academic classification of these animals. Basically, any prehistoric animal the name of which ends in "-saur" can be so-described, as well as others. Proposed short rafsi: -dis-. See also: {rexsa}, {ketslau}, {ikfiio}, {disrmuzo}, {plesiio}. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: dinosaur, In Sense: completely general Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.