Received: from 173-13-139-235-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.13.139.235]:59368 helo=jukni.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eGZ1R-0003CY-SD for jbovlaste-admin@lojban.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:29:11 -0800 Received: by jukni.digitalkingdom.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:29:09 -0800 From: "Apache" To: curtis289@att.net Reply-To: webmaster@lojban.org Subject: [jvsw] Definition Edited At Word xau'o'o -- By krtisfranks Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 15:29:09 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: 0.5 X-Spam_score_int: 5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "stodi.digitalkingdom.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "xau'o'o" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. --- > This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemdas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. 11,11d10 < Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: \n12a12,12 \n> Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: [...] Content analysis details: (0.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available. [173.13.139.235 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 1.0 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS In jbovlaste, the user krtisfranks has edited a definition of "xau'o'o" in the language "English". Differences: 5,5c5,5 < This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. --- > This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemdas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. 11,11d10 < Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: \n12a12,12 \n> Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: Old Data: Definition: mekso convention cancellation Notes: This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: Word: mekso convention cancellation, In Sense: Place Keywords: New Data: Definition: mekso convention cancellation Notes: This word is followed by an evaluated {li} clause (yielding specifically a number $n$, which probably is a non-negative integer, or a set thereof (the elements of which will also be denoted by simply $n$, for simplicity) ). It repeals the $n$th most recent/last convention (counting backward) for mekso/mathematical expressions defined by {xau'e'o}. In order to repeal all such conventions (returning to the conventions specified by some grammar collection), the set should include all integers less than or equal to some sufficiently large integer (which might be {ro}); {ro} denotes the first rule defined (the last rule counting backward from the most recent)- it does not reference "all rules defined"; the most recent rule is denoted by {pa}. Any named body/ordered collection of rules (such as ".pemdas.") is treated as being only one rule for the purposes of such counting. Jargon: Gloss Keywords: Word: mekso convention cancellation, In Sense: Word: xau'e'o repeal, In Sense: Place Keywords: You can go to to see it.